OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the detectability of in-stent stenoses in iliac artery stents using multidetector CT angiography in comparison with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different metallic stents (made of steel, nitinol, tantalum, or cobalt) were implanted in plastic tubes (8 mm). The stent lumina were partially obstructed by wax (CT density, -30 H) resulting in 50-60% in-stent stenoses. The tubes were filled with diluted contrast material (25 mmol/L of gadopentetate dimeglumine or 6 mg I/mL of iodinated contrast material) and placed in a plastic container filled with oil or water, respectively. CT angiography was performed on a four-detector CT scanner (detector collimation, 4 x 1 mm; slice thickness, 1.25 mm; table feed, 4 mm per rotation). MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T system with a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE, 4.6/1.8; flip angle, 30 degrees; slice thickness, 1.88 mm). Axial and longitudinal reformations of CT and MR imaging data were evaluated regarding the in-stent attenuation and signal intensity, the visible lumen diameter inside the stent, and the delineation of the stenoses. For comparison, digital radiographic angiography was performed as the gold standard. RESULTS: The degree and character of stent-related artifacts differed in CT angiography and MR angiography. In CT angiography, only the tantalum stent caused artifacts that obscured the stenosis; in all other cases, the stenoses were visible. In MR angiography, depiction of stenoses was impaired in two steel stents but possible in the tantalum and most nitinol stents. CONCLUSION: CT angiography is suited for detection of relevant stenoses in steel, cobalt-based, and nitinol stents. MR angiography is superior only in tantalum products.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the detectability of in-stent stenoses in iliac artery stents using multidetector CT angiography in comparison with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different metallic stents (made of steel, nitinol, tantalum, or cobalt) were implanted in plastic tubes (8 mm). The stent lumina were partially obstructed by wax (CT density, -30 H) resulting in 50-60% in-stent stenoses. The tubes were filled with diluted contrast material (25 mmol/L of gadopentetate dimeglumine or 6 mg I/mL of iodinated contrast material) and placed in a plastic container filled with oil or water, respectively. CT angiography was performed on a four-detector CT scanner (detector collimation, 4 x 1 mm; slice thickness, 1.25 mm; table feed, 4 mm per rotation). MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T system with a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE, 4.6/1.8; flip angle, 30 degrees; slice thickness, 1.88 mm). Axial and longitudinal reformations of CT and MR imaging data were evaluated regarding the in-stent attenuation and signal intensity, the visible lumen diameter inside the stent, and the delineation of the stenoses. For comparison, digital radiographic angiography was performed as the gold standard. RESULTS: The degree and character of stent-related artifacts differed in CT angiography and MR angiography. In CT angiography, only the tantalum stent caused artifacts that obscured the stenosis; in all other cases, the stenoses were visible. In MR angiography, depiction of stenoses was impaired in two steel stents but possible in the tantalum and most nitinol stents. CONCLUSION: CT angiography is suited for detection of relevant stenoses in steel, cobalt-based, and nitinol stents. MR angiography is superior only in tantalum products.
Authors: Martin Heuschmid; Benjamin Wiesinger; Gunnar Tepe; Oliver Luz; Andreas F Kopp; Claus D Claussen; Stephan H Duda Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: R Syha; D Ketelsen; M Kaempf; S Mangold; S Sixt; T Zeller; F Springer; F Schick; C D Claussen; K Brechtel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: K Perisinakis; E Manousaki; K Zourari; D Tsetis; A Tzedakis; A Papadakis; A Karantanas; J Damilakis Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Christopher Herzog; Christine Grebe; Andreas Mahnken; Joern O Balzer; Martin G Mack; Stefan Zangos; Hanns Ackermann; Stefan Schaller; Tobias Seifert; Bernd Ohnesorge; Thomas J Vogl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 2.804