Literature DB >> 28816615

In-stent hypodense area at two weeks following carotid artery stenting predicts neointimal hyperplasia after two years.

Kentaro Yamashita1,2, Jouji Kokuzawa2, Tatsuya Kuroda1, Satoru Murase1, Morio Kumagai1, Yasuhiko Kaku2.   

Abstract

Introduction It has not been reported how long the follow-up study after carotid artery stenting (CAS) should be continued. The purpose of the present study is to clarify the dynamic change of the in-stent neointimal layer and residual arterial lumen by two years following CAS using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D CTA) with volume rendering. Methods Thirty-six stented carotid arteries in 34 consecutive patients were examined by 3D CTA with volume rendering at two weeks and 3, 6, 12, 24 months of follow-up. Results An in-stent hypodense area could be detected in 10 of 36 (27.8%) carotid arteries at two weeks after CAS. In-stent hypodense areas gradually declined thereafter by three months. In the course of longer follow-up, the layer of the in-stent hypodense area (neointimal hyperplasia) continued to grow in size for up to 24 months. Patients with an in-stent hypodense area at two weeks have a thicker layer of neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months than patients without in-stent hypodense area at two weeks' follow-up. The predictive factors for growing neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months in multiple regression analysis are ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and the thickness of in-stent hypodense area at two weeks following CAS. Conclusion Our results suggest that follow-up study should be continued for a longer period even if in-stent restenosis could not be detected at one year following CAS. Especially in cases with ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and with a subacute in-stent hypodense area after CAS, longer follow-up is strongly recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery stenting; in-stent thrombus; neoatherosclerosis; neointimal hyperplasia; restenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28816615      PMCID: PMC5958497          DOI: 10.1177/1971400917727006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  21 in total

1.  Usefulness of CT angiography with volume rendering after carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  X Leclerc; J Y Gauvrit; J P Pruvo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.

Authors:  David Maintz; Bernd Tombach; Kai-Uwe Juergens; Stefanie Weigel; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Klaus Gröschel; Axel Riecker; Jörg B Schulz; Ulrike Ernemann; Andreas Kastrup
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  Hans-Henning Eckstein; Peter Ringleb; Jens-Rainer Allenberg; Jürgen Berger; Gustav Fraedrich; Werner Hacke; Michael Hennerici; Robert Stingele; Jens Fiehler; Hermann Zeumer; Olav Jansen
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Sequential morphological changes at the site of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  B N French; N B Rewcastle
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement.

Authors:  M H Wholey; M Wholey; K Mathias; G S Roubin; E B Diethrich; M Henry; S Bailey; P Bergeron; G Dorros; G Eles; P Gaines; C R Gomez; B Gray; J Guimaraens; R Higashida; D S Ho; B Katzen; A Kambara; V Kumar; J C Laborde; M Leon; M Lim; H Londero; J Mesa; A Musacchio; S Myla; S Ramee; A Rodriquez; K Rosenfield; N Sakai; F Shawl; H Sievert; G Teitelbaum; J G Theron; P Vaclav; C Vozzi; J S Yadav; S I Yoshimura
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Carotid artery stents: early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US.

Authors:  M L Robbin; M E Lockhart; T M Weber; J J Vitek; J K Smith; J Yadav; A Mathur; S S Iyer; G S Roubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Follow-up study on in-stent thrombosis after carotid stenting using multidetector CT angiography.

Authors:  Hirotaka Watarai; Yasuhiko Kaku; Mikito Yamada; Jouji Kokuzawa; Toshiki Tanaka; Takashi Andoh; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Hitinder S Gurm; Jay S Yadav; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Gary Ansel; Neil E Strickman; Hong Wang; Sidney A Cohen; Joseph M Massaro; Donald E Cutlip
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Residual Stenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Yunlu Tao; Yang Hua; Lingyun Jia; Liqun Jiao; Beibei Liu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Symptomatic atherosclerotic plaque progression in a first-generation carotid stent: management and 5-year clinical and imaging outcome-a case report.

Authors:  Lukasz Tekieli; Adam Mazurek; Piotr Pieniazek; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-11-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.