Literature DB >> 24241214

Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions.

Andrej Moličnik1, Marko Hanc, Gregor Rečnik, Zmago Krajnc, Mitja Rupreht, Samo K Fokter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate early functional results of revision hip arthroplasty with pelvic bone loss revised with porous tantalum (PT) acetabular components.
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (25 hips) with loose acetabular components after total hip arthroplasty with a minimum of Paprosky IIa pelvic bone loss treated with PT cups with and without modular augments were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Harris hip score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities scores. Mean follow-up was 20.5 months and no patient was lost during follow-up.
RESULTS: The average Harris hip score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities scores improved from 40 and 36 preoperatively to 79 and 73 postoperatively, respectively. No statistically significant differences in functional outcome scores were found between the group with moderate (Paprosky IIa, b) and severe (Paprosky IIc or more) acetabular bone loss. At the most recent radiographic evaluation, 24 cups demonstrated no lucent lines and 1 cup had lucent lines but remained well fixed. One cup was revised for traumatic dislocation but was found well fixed at open reduction. There were no septic or aseptic failures in this series.
CONCLUSION: While awaiting longer-term follow-up studies, trabecular metal components show sufficient primary stability and appear suitable for revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24241214     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1354-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  31 in total

Review 1.  A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science.

Authors:  Robert Cohen
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

2.  Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision.

Authors:  Eerik T Skyttä; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka O Paavolainen; Ville M Remes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments.

Authors:  Jonathan P Van Kleunen; Gwo-Chin Lee; Peter W Lementowski; Charles L Nelson; Jonathan P Garino
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions?

Authors:  X Flecher; W Paprosky; J-C Grillo; J-M Aubaniac; J-N Argenson
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 7.  Clinical applications of Trabecular Metal.

Authors:  Michael J Christie
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

8.  Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement.

Authors:  B Zicat; C A Engh; E Gokcen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review.

Authors:  M Abolghasemian; S Tangsataporn; A Sternheim; D Backstein; O Safir; A E Gross
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  7 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Bone integration in acetabular revision hip arthroplasty using equine-derived bone grafts: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Nicola Piolanti; Andrea Del Chiaro; Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Angelo Graceffa; Massimiliano Marcucci
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-19

3.  The Dome Technique, an Option for Massive Anterosuperior Medial Acetabular Bone Loss: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Christopher M Melnic; Matthew Knedel; P Maxwell Courtney; Neil P Sheth; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-12-16

4.  Clinical and radiological results over the medium term of isolated acetabular revision.

Authors:  Nicola Piolanti; Lorenzo Andreani; Paolo Domenico Parchi; Enrico Bonicoli; Francesco Niccolai; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-28

5.  Acetabular revisions using porous tantalum components: A retrospective study with 5-10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Francesco Roberto Evola; Luciano Costarella; Giuseppe Evola; Martina Barchitta; Antonella Agodi; Giuseppe Sessa
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-18

6.  Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision.

Authors:  Pascal Mueller Greber; Isabella Manzoni; Peter E Ochsner; Thomas Ilchmann; Lukas Zwicky; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Total Knee Replacement with an Uncemented Porous Tantalum Tibia Component: A Failure Analysis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Nenad Gubeljak; Esther Punzón-Quijorna; Primož Pelicon; Mitja Kelemen; Primož Vavpetič; Jožef Predan; Luka Ferlič; Igor Novak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.