Literature DB >> 12370444

Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila.

Andrea J Betancourt1, Daven C Presgraves.   

Abstract

Population genetic theory shows that the efficacy of natural selection is limited by linkage-selection at one site interferes with selection at linked sites. Such interference slows adaptation in asexual genomes and may explain the evolutionary advantage of sex. Here, we test for two signatures of constraint caused by linkage in a sexual genome, by using sequence data from 255 Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans loci. We find that (i) the rate of protein adaptation is reduced in regions of low recombination, and (ii) evolution at strongly selected amino acid sites interferes with optimal codon usage at weakly selected, tightly linked synonymous sites. Together these findings suggest that linkage limits the rate and degree of adaptation even in recombining genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12370444      PMCID: PMC129723          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.212277199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses.

Authors:  R Miralles; P J Gerrish; A Moya; S F Elena
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Different trajectories of parallel evolution during viral adaptation.

Authors:  H A Wichman; M R Badgett; L A Scott; C M Boulianne; J J Bull
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Diminishing returns of population size in the rate of RNA virus adaptation.

Authors:  R Miralles; A Moya; S F Elena
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  The rate of adaptation in asexuals.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  G A McVean; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.

Authors:  G Marais; D Mouchiroud; L Duret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Adaptive evolution of a candidate gene for aging in Drosophila.

Authors:  P S Schmidt; D D Duvernell; W F Eanes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Molecular population genetics of male accessory gland proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  D J Begun; P Whitley; B L Todd; H M Waldrip-Dail; A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.

Authors:  J M Comeron; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  93 in total

1.  The problem of counting sites in the estimation of the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates: implications for the correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans.

Authors:  Ines Hellmann; Ingo Ebersberger; Susan E Ptak; Svante Pääbo; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Functional divergence in tandemly duplicated Arabidopsis thaliana trypsin inhibitor genes.

Authors:  M J Clauss; T Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.