Literature DB >> 11320215

Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.

G Marais1, D Mouchiroud, L Duret.   

Abstract

Understanding the factors responsible for variations in mutation patterns and selection efficacy along chromosomes is a prerequisite for deciphering genome sequences. Population genetics models predict a positive correlation between the efficacy of selection at a given locus and the local rate of recombination because of Hill-Robertson effects. Codon usage is considered one of the most striking examples that support this prediction at the molecular level. In a wide range of species including Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, codon usage is essentially shaped by selection acting for translational efficiency. Codon usage bias correlates positively with recombination rate in Drosophila, apparently supporting the hypothesis that selection on codon usage is improved by recombination. Here we present an exhaustive analysis of codon usage in C. elegans and D. melanogaster complete genomes. We show that in both genomes there is a positive correlation between recombination rate and the frequency of optimal codons. However, we demonstrate that in both species, this effect is due to a mutational bias toward G and C bases in regions of high recombination rate, possibly as a direct consequence of the recombination process. The correlation between codon usage bias and recombination rate in these species appears to be essentially determined by recombination-dependent mutational patterns, rather than selective effects. This result highlights that it is necessary to take into account the mutagenic effect of recombination to understand the evolutionary role and impact of recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11320215      PMCID: PMC33274          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.091427698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  The neutralist, the fly and the selectionist.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair.

Authors:  J N Strathern; B K Shafer; C B McGill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  GenBank.

Authors:  D A Benson; M S Boguski; D J Lipman; J Ostell; B F Ouellette; B A Rapp; D L Wheeler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  FlyBase: a Drosophila database.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  118 in total

1.  Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations.

Authors:  D Posada; K A Crandall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Through a genome, darkly: comparative analysis of plant chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Richard M Kliman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Carène Rizzon; Gabriel Marais; Manolo Gouy; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Intron size correlates positively with recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Anuphap Prachumwat; Laura DeVincentis; Michael F Palopoli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion: I. Mutation load and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evolutionary analysis of the CACTA DNA-transposon Caspar across wheat species using sequence comparison and in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Ekaterina M Sergeeva; Elena A Salina; Irina G Adonina; Boulos Chalhoub
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.

Authors:  Laurie S Stevison; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Galtier; Eric Bazin; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.