Literature DB >> 8418705

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

D J Deziel1, K W Millikan, S G Economou, A Doolas, S T Ko, M C Airan.   

Abstract

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were evaluated by a survey of surgical department chairpersons at 4,292 US hospitals. The 77,604 cases were reported by 1,750 respondents. Laparotomy was required for treatment of a complication in 1.2% of patients. The mean rate of bile duct injury (exclusive of cystic duct) was 0.6% and was significantly lower at institutions that had performed more than 100 cases. Bile duct injuries were recognized postoperatively in half of the cases and most frequently required anastomotic repair. Intraoperative cholangiography was practiced selectively by 52% of the respondents and routinely by 31%. Bowel and vascular injuries, which occurred in 0.14% and 0.25% of cases, respectively, were the most lethal complications. Postoperative bile leak was recognized in 0.3% of patients, most commonly originating from the cystic duct. Eighteen of 33 postoperative deaths resulted from operative injury. These data demonstrate that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with low rates of morbidity and mortality but a significant rate of bile duct injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8418705     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80397-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  275 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in routine practice: duct injury as an index event.

Authors:  T F Gorey; P Papasavas
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Brush dissection technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Ohashi; E Taniguchi; S Takiguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Asymptomatic omental granuloma following spillage of gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy protects patients and influences surgeons' decisions: a review.

Authors:  Iordanis N Papadopoulos; Spyridon Christodoulou; Nikolaos Economopoulos
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-23

4.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Endobiliary endoprosthesis without sphincterotomy for the treatment of biliary leakage.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; G Paroutoglou; A Beltsis; P Tsolkas; M Arvaniti; D Katsiba; A Kalifatidis; S Boutsioukis; S Baltagiannis; E Georgiadou; A Iliadis; P Kapelidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Iatrogenic bile duct injuries.

Authors:  P R Savassi-Rocha; S R Almeida; M D Sanches; M A C Andrade; J T Frerreira; M T C Diniz; A L S Rocha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Analysis of errors in laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Authors:  N E Seymour; A G Gallagher; S A Roman; M K O'Brien; D K Andersen; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Bile duct replacement using an autologous femoral vein graft: an experimental study. Preliminary results.

Authors:  Pablo Capitanich; Javier Herrera; Mario L Iovaldi; Roque Balbuena; Gabriel Casas; Patricio Malizia; Maximiliano Bun; Norberto Mezzadri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.