Literature DB >> 12359837

Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis.

Kelly M Goedert1, Daniel B Willingham.   

Abstract

The studies reported here used an interference paradigm to determine whether a long-term consolidation process (i.e., one lasting from several hours to days) occurs in the learning of two implicit motor skills, learning of a movement sequence and learning of a visuo-motor mapping. Subjects learned one skill and were tested on that skill 48 h later. Between the learning session and test session, some subjects trained on a second skill. The amount of time between the learning of the two skills varied for different subjects. In both the learning of a movement sequence and the learning of a visuo-motor mapping, we found that remote memories were susceptible to interference, but the passage of time did not afford protection from interference. These results are inconsistent with the long-term consolidation of these motor skills. A possible difference between these tasks and those that do show long-term consolidation is that the present tasks are not dynamic motor skills.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12359837      PMCID: PMC187137          DOI: 10.1101/lm.50102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  38 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of competing motor memories.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; H H Holcomb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Memory--a century of consolidation.

Authors:  J L McGaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  What can amnesic patients learn?

Authors:  D N Brooks; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Involvement of entorhinal cortex or parietal cortex in long-term spatial discrimination memory in rats: retrograde amnesia.

Authors:  Y H Cho; R P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The neurology of memory: quantitative assessment of retrograde amnesia in two groups of amnesic patients.

Authors:  L R Squire; F Haist; A P Shimamura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effects of regional GABAergic blockade of the striatum on memory consolidation.

Authors:  R Salado-Castillo; M A Díaz del Guante; R Alvarado; G L Quirarte; R A Prado-Alcalá
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.877

View more
  50 in total

1.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference.

Authors:  R Christopher Miall; Ned Jenkinson; Kunal Kulkarni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multiple shifts in the representation of a motor sequence during the acquisition of skilled performance.

Authors:  Maria Korman; Naftali Raz; Tamar Flash; Avi Karni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Consolidation of motor memory.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Two waves of a long-lasting aftereffect of prism adaptation measured over 7 days.

Authors:  Y Hatada; R C Miall; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Off-line learning and the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Edwin M Robertson; Daniel Z Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Simultaneous sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrew G Richardson; Emilio Bizzi; Daniel Z Press
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human adaptation to rotated vision: interplay of a continuous and a discrete process.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Sylvie Abeele; Udo Eversheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Consciousness and the consolidation of motor learning.

Authors:  Sunbin Song
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.