Literature DB >> 27329735

When knowledge of a heritable gene mutation comes out of the blue: treatment-focused genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

B Meiser1, V F Quinn1, M Gleeson2, J Kirk3,4, K M Tucker5, B Rahman1, C Saunders6, K J Watts1, M Peate1,7, E Geelhoed8, K Barlow-Stewart9, M Field10, M Harris11, Y C Antill12, G Mitchell13.   

Abstract

Selection of women for treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT) following a new diagnosis of breast cancer is changing. Increasingly a patient's age and tumour characteristics rather than only their family history are driving access to TFGT, but little is known about the impact of receiving carrier-positive results in individuals with no family history of cancer. This study assesses the role of knowledge of a family history of cancer on psychosocial adjustment to TFGT in both women with and without mutation carrier-positive results. In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 women who had undergone TFGT, and who had been purposively sampled to represent women both family history and carrier status, and subjected to a rigorous qualitative analysis. It was found that mutation carriers without a family history reported difficulties in making surgical decisions quickly, while in carriers with a family history, a decision regarding surgery, electing for bilateral mastectomy (BM), had often already been made before receipt of their result. Long-term adjustment to a mutation-positive result was hindered by a sense of isolation not only by those without a family history but also those with a family history who lacked an affected relative with whom they could identify. Women with a family history who had no mutation identified and who had not elected BM reported a lack of closure following TFGT. These findings indicate support deficits hindering adjustment to positive TFGT results for women with and without a family history, particularly in regard to immediate decision-making about risk-reducing surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27329735      PMCID: PMC5110066          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  26 in total

1.  Short term psychological distress in patients actively approached for genetic counselling after diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jeanne van Echtelt; Jan van den Bout; Margreet G E M Ausems; Herman F J ten Kroode
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  T Byrski; T Huzarski; R Dent; E Marczyk; M Jasiowka; J Gronwald; J Jakubowicz; C Cybulski; R Wisniowski; D Godlewski; J Lubinski; S A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Randomized controlled trial of a telephone-based peer-support program for women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: impact on psychological distress.

Authors:  Victoria M White; Mary-Anne Young; Ashley Farrelly; Bettina Meiser; Michael Jefford; Elizabeth Williamson; Sandra Ieropoli; Jessica Duffy; Ingrid Winship
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility.

Authors:  Mark E Robson; Angela R Bradbury; Banu Arun; Susan M Domchek; James M Ford; Heather L Hampel; Stephen M Lipkin; Sapna Syngal; Dana S Wollins; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Impact of genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Starlene Loader; Cleveland G Shields; Peter T Rowley
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

7.  Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002

Review 8.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

Review 9.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Peter C Fong; David S Boss; Timothy A Yap; Andrew Tutt; Peijun Wu; Marja Mergui-Roelvink; Peter Mortimer; Helen Swaisland; Alan Lau; Mark J O'Connor; Alan Ashworth; James Carmichael; Stan B Kaye; Jan H M Schellens; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Psychological outcomes and surgical decisions after genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer with and without a family history.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Veronica F Quinn; Gillian Mitchell; Kathy Tucker; Kaaren J Watts; Belinda Rahman; Michelle Peate; Christobel Saunders; Elizabeth Geelhoed; Margaret Gleeson; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Michael Field; Marion Harris; Yoland C Antill; Rachel Susman; Michael T Bowen; Llew Mills; Judy Kirk
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Global Disparities in Breast Cancer Genetics Testing, Counselling and Management.

Authors:  C H Yip; D G Evans; G Agarwal; I Buccimazza; A Kwong; R Morant; I Prakash; C Y Song; N A Taib; C Tausch; O Ung; S Meterissian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Consent for Genetic Testing Using an Oncologist- or Genetic Counselor-Mediated Model of Care.

Authors:  Jeanna M McCuaig; Emily Thain; Janet Malcolmson; Sareh Keshavarzi; Susan Randall Armel; Raymond H Kim
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes Associated with Alternative Models of Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.

Authors:  Jeanna M McCuaig; Susan Randall Armel; Melanie Care; Alexandra Volenik; Raymond H Kim; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Authors:  Sarah Wright; Mary Porteous; Diane Stirling; Julia Lawton; Oliver Young; Charlie Gourley; Nina Hallowell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Recommendations for Advancing the Diagnosis and Management of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Achatz; Maira Caleffi; Rodrigo Guindalini; Renato Moretti Marques; Angelica Nogueira-Rodrigues; Patricia Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.