Literature DB >> 16447378

Attentional rubbernecking: cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness.

Steven B Most1, Marvin M Chun, David M Widders, David H Zald.   

Abstract

Emotional stimuli often attract attention, but at what cost to the processing of other stimuli? Given the potential costs, to what degree can people override emotion-based attentional biases? In Experiment 1, participants searched for a single target within a rapid serial visual presentation of pictures; an irrelevant, emotionally negative or neutral picture preceded the target by either two or eight items. At the shorter lag, negative pictures spontaneously induced greater deficits in target processing than neutral pictures did. Thus, attentional biases to emotional information induced a temporary inability to process stimuli that people actively sought. Experiment 2 revealed that participants could reduce this effect through attentional strategy, but that the extent of this reduction was related to their level of the personality trait harm avoidance. Participants lower in harm avoidance were able to reduce emotion-induced blindness under conditions designed to facilitate the ignoring of the emotional stimuli. Those higher in harm avoidance were unable to do so.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16447378     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Authors:  H Pashler; L P Shiu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

2.  The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis.

Authors:  Harald T Schupp; Markus Junghöfer; Almut I Weike; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Paying attention to meaning.

Authors:  P J Barnard; S Scott; J Taylor; J May; W Knightley
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03

4.  The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: U.S. normative data.

Authors:  C R Cloninger; T R Przybeck; D M Svrakic
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1991-12

5.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

Authors:  C MacLeod; A Mathews; P Tata
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1986-02

7.  Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control.

Authors:  Douglas Derryberry; Marjorie A Reed
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-05

8.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Brian J Scholl; Erin R Clifford; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: controlling attention to threat-related stimuli.

Authors:  Sonia Bishop; John Duncan; Matthew Brett; Andrew D Lawrence
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-04       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  100 in total

1.  Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Marissa A Gorlick; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-12

2.  Emotional distraction unbalances visual processing.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

3.  Beyond arousal and valence: the importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Kazuhisa Niki; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Negative arousal amplifies the effects of saliency in short-term memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-05-28

5.  What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; L Forest Gruss; Steven Garcia; David R Herring; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Emotion enhances remembrance of neutral events past.

Authors:  Adam K Anderson; Peter E Wais; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mental rubbernecking to negative information depends on task context.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Joseph T McGuire; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

8.  A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images.

Authors:  Yi Jiang; Patricia Costello; Fang Fang; Miner Huang; Sheng He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Unmasking the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark R Nieuwenstein; Mary C Potter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Association learning for emotional harbinger cues: when do previous emotional associations impair and when do they facilitate subsequent learning of new associations?

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Alexandra E Ycaza-Herrera; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.