Literature DB >> 20821170

Dependence of radiographic sensitivity of CR imaging plate on X-ray tube voltage.

Yoshiyuki Asai1, Masanobu Uemura, Masao Matsumoto, Hitoshi Kanamori.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to compare the energy absorbed in a computed radiography (CR) plate with that absorbed by a film-screen system over the diagnostic X-ray tube voltage range. A Fuji ST-II and Fuji HGM/UR2 were selected as a CR plate and film-screen system, respectively. The X-ray energy absorbed by the phosphor layer (per mA per unit area) was calculated theoretically as an index of the radiographic sensitivity by use of the incident X-ray photon spectrum with the Birch-Marshall formula and the sensitivity spectrum for the range of 40-140 kV. The radiosensitive media were treated as layers involving mass loading. The relative radiographic sensitivity of the ST-II CR plate best approached that of the HGM/UR2 film-screen at 60 kV; it was considerably lower for the ST-II CR plate on both sides of 60 kV. The relative sensitivities at 40 and 140 kV of the ST-II CR plate to the HGM/UR2 film-screen decreased by 16 and 30%, respectively. This result implies that, in the CR system, the mAs values must be increased by 16 and 30% at 40 and 140 kV, respectively. These results were explained by the relative positions of the K-absorption edges of the phosphors. The theoretically calculated result was in good agreement with the experimental result obtained with an acrylic resin phantom. These results would be useful in preventing under- or overexposure in a CR system and thus controlling the dose administered to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 20821170     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-007-0015-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  17 in total

1.  Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.

Authors:  Lynn N Rill; Libby Brateman; Manuel Arreola
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Regional improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen CR chest imaging--a phantom study.

Authors:  X Liu; C C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.

Authors:  S Mazzocchi; G Belli; S Busoni; C Gori; I Menchi; P Salucci; A Taddeucci; G Zatelli
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Computed radiography X-ray exposure trends.

Authors:  J A Seibert; D K Shelton; E H Moore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Screen/film system speed: its dependence on x-ray energy.

Authors:  C J Vyborny; C E Metz; K Doi; K Rossmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Computation of bremsstrahlung X-ray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a Ge(Li) detector.

Authors:  R Birch; M Marshall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.

Authors:  C Kimme-Smith; D R Aberle; J W Sayre; E M Hart; S M Greaves; K Brown; D A Young; M D Deseran; T Johnson; S L Johnson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; Kris Bonnarens; An De Hauwere; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.

Authors:  Sinead E Peters; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.

Authors:  Z F Lu; E L Nickoloff; J C So; A K Dutta
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

1.  Determining paediatric patient thickness from a single digital radiograph-a proof of principle.

Authors:  Mark Worrall; Sarah Vinnicombe; David G Sutton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.