Literature DB >> 12154392

A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip.

M L Frost1, G M Blake, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether calcaneal quantitative ultrasound can discriminate between women with and those without fragility fracture at (1) the wrist or (2) at sites other than the spine, hip, or forearm, as well as axial DXA measurements of BMD can. The study population consisted of 342 postmenopausal Caucasian women who were placed into one of three groups: (1) healthy women with no clinical risk factors for osteoporosis (n = 240); (2) women with a history of atraumatic fracture at the wrist (n = 50); (3) women with a history of atraumatic fracture at a skeletal site other than the spine, hip, or wrist (n = 52). Subjects had DXA measurements of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (THIP), and calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) measurements on the Hologic Sahara (s) and Osteometer DTUone (d). Z-scores were calculated using the mean and SD obtained from the healthy postmenopausal group. All the BMD and QUS variables were significantly reduced in women reporting a fracture of the wrist or at a site other than the spine, hip, or forearm. When the group of women with a history of wrist fracture were compared with the postmenopausal controls, age-adjusted logistic regression yielded odds ratios associated with a 1 SD decrease, that were significant for both BMD and QUS, averaging 2.2. The AUC values ranged from 0.65 for FN BMD to 0.75 for BUAd. BMD and QUS measurements were also significantly reduced in women reporting a skeletal fracture at a site other than the spine, hip, or wrist, and odds ratios for BMD and QUS were significant, averaging 1.7. BMD and QUS showed similar fracture discriminatory abilities that were not significantly different from one another. In conclusion, calcaneal QUS can discriminate between women with and those without fracture at the wrist or at sites other than the spine, hip, or forearm as well as axial DXA measurements of BMD can.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12154392     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-001-2074-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  13 in total

1.  Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modelling.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Todd L Bredbenner
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Prevalence of Bone Mineral Density Abnormalities and Factors Affecting Bone Density in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Southern India.

Authors:  Krishnappriya Ramachandran; Sathish Kumar Mani; Gopinath Kango Gopal; Srinivasan Rangasami
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  Prediction of absolute risk of non-spinal fractures using clinical risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  A Díez-Pérez; J González-Macías; F Marín; M Abizanda; R Alvarez; A Gimeno; E Pegenaute; J Vila
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A El Maghraoui; F Morjane; A Mounach; M Ghazi; A Nouijai; L Achemlal; A Bezza; I Ghozlani
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Measurement of human trabecular bone by novel ultrasonic bone densitometry based on fast and slow waves.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; T Otani; H Hagino; H Katagiri; T Okano; I Mano; R Teshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Should age influence the choice of quantitative bone assessment technique in elderly women? The EPIDOS study.

Authors:  A M Schott; B Kassaï Koupaï; D Hans; P Dargent-Molina; R Ecochard; D C Bauer; G Bréart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Unique and common genetic effects between bone mineral density and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures: the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  M Lee; S A Czerwinski; A C Choh; E W Demerath; S S Sun; W C Chumlea; B Towne; R M Siervogel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Low bone mineral density in COPD patients related to worse lung function, low weight and decreased fat-free mass.

Authors:  A Vrieze; M H G de Greef; P J Wijkstra; P J Wýkstra; J B Wempe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Effect of age and disease on bone mass in Japanese patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Takashi Umeda; Shoko Tsuchimine; Akira Fujii; Yasushi Sato; Manabu Saito; Hanako Furukori; Kazuma Danjo; Masashi Matsuzaka; Ippei Takahashi; Sunao Kaneko
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.