Literature DB >> 18953537

Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

A El Maghraoui1, F Morjane, A Mounach, M Ghazi, A Nouijai, L Achemlal, A Bezza, I Ghozlani.   

Abstract

Due to its low cost, portability, and nonionizing radiation, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel is an alternative to the measurement with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the evaluation of bone status. The objective of the study is to compare in asymptomatic postmenopausal women the ability of QUS and DXA to discriminate between those with and without prevalent vertebral fractures (VFs). The study cohort consists of a population of 295 postmenopausal women aged between 60 and 84 (mean age, weight and BMI of 66.3 years, 72.0 kg and 29.4 kg/m(2), respectively). Lateral VFA images and scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were obtained by two technologists using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer. VFs were defined using a combination of Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry. All women had a calcaneous QUS examination. The mean age of the women in our sample was 66.3 (+/-5.3) years, ranging from 60 to 84 years. Eighty-seven (29.3%) women had VFs Genant grade 2 and 3. Patients with VFs had an age and a number of years of menopause higher to those without VFs, but showed lower height, weight, and BMI. All densitometric and ultrasonometric measurements were significantly reduced in women with VFs. The intercorrelations of BMD at different sites were high, and the correlations of BUA with BMD were lower. BUA correlated weakly with total hip BMD (r = 0.36), lumbar spine BMD (r = 0.32), and much less with femur BMD (r = 0.30); all correlations were significant (P < 0.01). Analysis of the AUC for the ROC curves showed lumbar spine T-score below -2.5 to provide consistently the highest AUC (0.64). Age-adjusted ORs after correction for confounding variables (years of menopause, weight, height, and BMI) for QUS and BMD measurements showed that only lumbar spine T-score below -2.5 could predict significantly the presence of VFs (OR, 1.94; 95%CI, 1.02-3.41). Lumbar spine BMD (and not QUS) was able to discriminate asymptomatic postmenopausal women with prevalent VFs from women without VFs and independently contributed to determining the association with fracture. The combination of QUS and BMD did not improve the diagnostic ability of either individual technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953537     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-008-0751-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  33 in total

1.  Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?

Authors:  M L Frost; G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; F Duboeuf; H O Marion-Audibert; B Kalpakçioglu; B H Mitlak; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  F Hartl; A Tyndall; M Kraenzlin; C Bachmeier; C Gückel; U Senn; D Hans; R Theiler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  What is the role of DXA, QUS and bone markers in fracture prediction, treatment allocation and monitoring?

Authors:  Karine Briot; Christian Roux
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.

Authors:  M L Frost; G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Body mass index and gynecological factors as determinants of bone mass in healthy Moroccan women.

Authors:  Abdellah El Maghraoui; Ahmed Anas Guerboub; Aziza Mounach; Imad Ghozlani; Abderrazak Nouijai; Mirieme Ghazi; Lahsen Achemlal; Ahmed Bezza; Mohamed Adnane Tazi
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study.

Authors:  Claus C Glüer; Richard Eastell; David M Reid; Dieter Felsenberg; Christian Roux; Reinhard Barkmann; Wolfram Timm; Tilo Blenk; Gabi Armbrecht; Alison Stewart; Jackie Clowes; Friederike E Thomasius; Sami Kolta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; J Li; C Y Wu; J A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Predicting a second hip fracture.

Authors:  A Stewart; L G Walker; R W Porter; D M Reid; W R Primrose
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporotic hip and vertebral fractures in the Arab region: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Barake; R El Eid; S Ajjour; M Chakhtoura; L Meho; T Mahmoud; J Atieh; A M Sibai; G El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Pulse-Echo Measurements of Bone Tissues. Techniques and Clinical Results at the Spine and Femur.

Authors:  Delia Ciardo; Paola Pisani; Francesco Conversano; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  New perspectives in echographic diagnosis of osteoporosis on hip and spine.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Paola Pisani; Maurizio Muratore
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus quantitative ultrasonography in diagnosing osteoporosis in patients with refractory epilepsy and chronic antiepileptic drug use.

Authors:  Kim Beerhorst; Joost Tan; In Yu Tan; Pauline Verschuure; Albert P Aldenkamp
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  A novel quantitative method for estimating bone mineral density using B-mode ultrasound and radiofrequency signals-a pilot study on patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Violeta-Claudia Bojincă; Claudiu C Popescu; Raluca-Daniela Decianu; Andrei Dobrescu; Șerban Mihai Bălănescu; Andra-Rodica Bălănescu; Mihai Bojincă
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound as a determinant of bone health status: what properties of bone does it reflect?

Authors:  Kok-Yong Chin; Soelaiman Ima-Nirwana
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.