Literature DB >> 16541205

Unique and common genetic effects between bone mineral density and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures: the Fels Longitudinal Study.

M Lee1, S A Czerwinski, A C Choh, E W Demerath, S S Sun, W C Chumlea, B Towne, R M Siervogel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Areal bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measures are correlated, and both traits predict osteoporotic fracture risk independently. However, few studies have examined whether common genetic effects (i.e., pleiotropy) exist between these traits in extended families. In this study, we estimated the additive genetic correlation and random environmental correlation between BMD measured at various skeletal sites and calcaneal QUS measures.
METHODS: Our sample included 537 adults (251 men and 286 women) from 110 families participating in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, and total body BMD were measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Three measures of calcaneal structure--broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), and quantitative ultrasound index (QUI)--were collected from the non-dominant heel using the Sahara sonometer. Applying a variance components-based maximum likelihood method, we estimated the heritability of each trait and estimated the genetic and environmental correlations between the different BMD and QUS measures.
RESULTS: Heritability estimates were significant for all measures of BMD and QUS ranging from 0.55 to 0.78. Significant non-zero genetic correlations were found between the different BMD and QUS measures. All genetic correlations were also significantly different from 1. Genetic correlations between total hip BMD and each of the QUS measures were 0.63 with BUA, 0.50 with SOS, and 0.56 with QUI. For femoral neck BMD, genetic correlations were similar to those between total hip BMD and QUS measures. Genetic correlations between BMD of the lumbar spine and QUS measures ranged from 0.34 to 0.38, and those between total body BMD and QUS measures, from 0.51 to 0.54. In contrast, all random environmental correlations were not significantly different from zero.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that BMD and calcaneal QUS measures among healthy men and women are significantly heritable and are, in part, jointly influenced by a common set of underlying genes. Additionally, this study also provides evidence for a unique set of genes that independently influences each individual trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16541205     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0075-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  39 in total

1.  Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties?

Authors:  C C Glüer; M Vahlensieck; K G Faulkner; K Engelke; D Black; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?

Authors:  M L Frost; G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adult women: a reevaluation of the twin model and the potential importance of gene interaction on heritability estimates.

Authors:  C W Slemenda; J C Christian; C J Williams; J A Norton; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Prediction of bone strength of distal forearm using radius bone mineral density and phalangeal speed of sound.

Authors:  C Wu; D Hans; Y He; B Fan; C F Njeh; P Augat; J Richards; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus reflects the mechanical properties of calcaneal trabecular bone.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; S E Radloff
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass?: a two-dimensional histomorphometric study.

Authors:  D Hans; M E Arlot; A M Schott; J P Roux; P O Kotzki; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Determination of bone mineral density of the hip and spine in human pedigrees by genetic and life-style factors.

Authors:  H W Deng; W M Chen; T Conway; Y Zhou; K M Davies; M R Stegman; H Deng; R R Recker
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study.

Authors:  Claus C Glüer; Richard Eastell; David M Reid; Dieter Felsenberg; Christian Roux; Reinhard Barkmann; Wolfram Timm; Tilo Blenk; Gabi Armbrecht; Alison Stewart; Jackie Clowes; Friederike E Thomasius; Sami Kolta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Genetic and environmental determinants of bone mineral density in Mexican Americans: results from the San Antonio Family Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Braxton D Mitchell; Candace M Kammerer; Jennifer L Schneider; Reina Perez; Richard L Bauer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Heritability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures in healthy adults from the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Miryoung Lee; Stefan A Czerwinski; Audrey C Choh; Bradford Towne; Ellen W Demerath; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Shumei S Sun; Roger M Siervogel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  9 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures during childhood.

Authors:  M Lee; R W Nahhas; A C Choh; E W Demerath; D L Duren; W C Chumlea; R J Sherwood; B Towne; R M Siervogel; S A Czerwinski
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Strong familial association of bone mineral density between parents and offspring: KNHANES 2008-2011.

Authors:  H S Choi; J H Park; S H Kim; S Shin; M J Park
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative genetics of cortical bone mass in healthy 10-year-old children from the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Dana L Duren; Richard J Sherwood; Audrey C Choh; Stefan A Czerwinski; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Miryoung Lee; Shumei S Sun; Ellen W Demerath; Roger M Siervogel; Bradford Towne
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Genetic influence on bone mineral density in Korean twins and families: the healthy twin study.

Authors:  J-H Park; Y-M Song; J Sung; K Lee; Y S Kim; Y S Park
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Genetic influence on the association between bone mineral density and testosterone in Korean men.

Authors:  J Shin; J Sung; K Lee; Y-M Song
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Genetic determinants of heel bone properties: genome-wide association meta-analysis and replication in the GEFOS/GENOMOS consortium.

Authors:  Alireza Moayyeri; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; David Karasik; Karol Estrada; Su-Mei Xiao; Carrie Nielson; Priya Srikanth; Sylvie Giroux; Scott G Wilson; Hou-Feng Zheng; Albert V Smith; Stephen R Pye; Paul J Leo; Alexander Teumer; Joo-Yeon Hwang; Claes Ohlsson; Fiona McGuigan; Ryan L Minster; Caroline Hayward; José M Olmos; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Joshua R Lewis; Karin M A Swart; Laura Masi; Chris Oldmeadow; Elizabeth G Holliday; Sulin Cheng; Natasja M van Schoor; Nicholas C Harvey; Marcin Kruk; Fabiola del Greco M; Wilmar Igl; Olivia Trummer; Efi Grigoriou; Robert Luben; Ching-Ti Liu; Yanhua Zhou; Ling Oei; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Joseph Zmuda; Greg Tranah; Suzanne J Brown; Frances M Williams; Nicole Soranzo; Johanna Jakobsdottir; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Kate L Holliday; Anke Hannemann; Min Jin Go; Melissa Garcia; Ozren Polasek; Marika Laaksonen; Kun Zhu; Anke W Enneman; Mark McEvoy; Roseanne Peel; Pak Chung Sham; Maciej Jaworski; Åsa Johansson; Andrew A Hicks; Pawel Pludowski; Rodney Scott; Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten; Nathalie van der Velde; Mika Kähönen; Jorma S Viikari; Harri Sievänen; Olli T Raitakari; Jesús González-Macías; Jose L Hernández; Dan Mellström; Osten Ljunggren; Yoon Shin Cho; Uwe Völker; Matthias Nauck; Georg Homuth; Henry Völzke; Robin Haring; Matthew A Brown; Eugene McCloskey; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Richard Eastell; John A Eisman; Graeme Jones; Ian R Reid; Elaine M Dennison; John Wark; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Frederick C W Wu; Thor Aspelund; J Brent Richards; Doug Bauer; Albert Hofman; Kay-Tee Khaw; George Dedoussis; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Ulf Gyllensten; Peter P Pramstaller; Roman S Lorenc; Cyrus Cooper; Annie Wai Chee Kung; Paul Lips; Markku Alen; John Attia; Maria Luisa Brandi; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Terho Lehtimäki; José A Riancho; Harry Campbell; Yongmei Liu; Tamara B Harris; Kristina Akesson; Magnus Karlsson; Jong-Young Lee; Henri Wallaschofski; Emma L Duncan; Terence W O'Neill; Vilmundur Gudnason; Timothy D Spector; François Rousseau; Eric Orwoll; Steven R Cummings; Nick J Wareham; Fernando Rivadeneira; Andre G Uitterlinden; Richard L Prince; Douglas P Kiel; Jonathan Reeve; Stephen K Kaptoge
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Identification of 153 new loci associated with heel bone mineral density and functional involvement of GPC6 in osteoporosis.

Authors:  John P Kemp; John A Morris; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Vincenzo Forgetta; Nicole M Warrington; Scott E Youlten; Jie Zheng; Celia L Gregson; Elin Grundberg; Katerina Trajanoska; John G Logan; Andrea S Pollard; Penny C Sparkes; Elena J Ghirardello; Rebecca Allen; Victoria D Leitch; Natalie C Butterfield; Davide Komla-Ebri; Anne-Tounsia Adoum; Katharine F Curry; Jacqueline K White; Fiona Kussy; Keelin M Greenlaw; Changjiang Xu; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; David J Adams; Celia M T Greenwood; Matthew T Maurano; Stephen Kaptoge; Fernando Rivadeneira; Jonathan H Tobias; Peter I Croucher; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; J H Duncan Bassett; Graham R Williams; J Brent Richards; David M Evans
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  Use of Mendelian Randomization to Examine Causal Inference in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jie Zheng; Monika Frysz; John P Kemp; David M Evans; George Davey Smith; Jonathan H Tobias
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Integrating genome-wide association and transcriptome prediction model identifies novel target genes for osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Zhu; P Yin; F Hu; J Jiang; L Yin; Y Li; S Wang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.