Literature DB >> 35508869

Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Didier Hans1, Antoine Métrailler2, Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez2, Olivier Lamy2, Enisa Shevroja2.   

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) presents a low cost and readily available alternative to DXA measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment. It is performed in a variety of skeletal sites, among which the most widely investigated and clinically used are first the calcaneus and then the radius. Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty in the incorporation of QUS in the clinical management of osteoporosis as the level of clinical validation differs substantially upon the QUS models available. In fact, results from a given QUS device can unlikely be extrapolated to another one, given the technological differences between QUS devices. The use of QUS in clinical routine to identify individuals at low or high risk of fracture could be considered primarily when central DXA is not easily available. In this later case, it is recommended that QUS bone parameters are used in combination with established clinical risk factors for fracture. Currently, stand-alone QUS is not recommended for treatment initiation decision making or follow-up. As WHO classification of osteoporosis thresholds cannot apply to QUS, thresholds specific for given QUS devices and parameters need to be determined and cross-validated widely to have a well-defined and certain use of QUS in osteoporosis clinical workflow. Despite the acknowledged current clinical limitations for QUS to be used more widely in daily routine, substantial progresses have been made and new results are promising.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BUA; Fracture; Osteoporosis; Quantitative ultrasound; SOS

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35508869     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  107 in total

1.  Assessment of bone mineral at appendicular sites in females with fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  P Augat; B Fan; N E Lane; T F Lang; P LeHir; Y Lu; M Uffmann; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Ethnic differences in hip fracture: a reduced incidence in Mexican Americans.

Authors:  R L Bauer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture.

Authors:  C Cepollaro; S Gonnelli; C Pondrelli; S Martini; A Montagnani; S Rossi; L Gennari; C Gennari
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study.

Authors:  Jackie A Clowes; Richard Eastell; Nicola F A Peel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Absolute fracture-risk prediction by a combination of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density.

Authors:  Mei Y Chan; Nguyen D Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry for the prediction of incident fragility fractures: A 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Giovanni Arioli; Gerolamo Bianchi; Maria Luisa Brandi; Carla Caffarelli; Luisella Cianferotti; Davide Gatti; Giuseppe Girasole; Stefano Gonnelli; Monica Manfredini; Maurizio Muratore; Eugenio Quarta; Laura Quarta
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  F E Alenfeld; C Wüster; C Funck; J F Pereira-Lima; T Fritz; P J Meeder; R Ziegler
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Associations between radius low-frequency axial ultrasound velocity and bone fragility in elderly men and women.

Authors:  E Biver; J Pepe; A de Sire; T Chevalley; S Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  D C Bauer; C C Glüer; H K Genant; K Stone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination.

Authors:  R Barkmann; E Kantorovich; C Singal; D Hans; H K Genant; M Heller; C C Glüer
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.