Literature DB >> 12141354

The effect of channel interactions on speech recognition in cochlear implant subjects: predictions from an acoustic model.

Chandra S Throckmorton1, Leslie M Collins.   

Abstract

Acoustic models that produce speech signals with information content similar to that provided to cochlear implant users provide a mechanism by which to investigate the effect of various implant-specific processing or hardware parameters independent of other complicating factors. This study compares speech recognition of normal-hearing subjects listening through normal and impaired acoustic models of cochlear implant speech processors. The channel interactions that were simulated to impair the model were based on psychophysical data measured from cochlear implant subjects and include pitch reversals, indiscriminable electrodes, and forward masking effects. In general, spectral interactions degraded speech recognition more than temporal interactions. These effects were frequency dependent with spectral interactions that affect lower-frequency information causing the greatest decrease in speech recognition, and interactions that affect higher-frequency information having the least impact. The results of this study indicate that channel interactions, quantified psychophysically, affect speech recognition to different degrees. Investigation of the effects that channel interactions have on speech recognition may guide future research whose goal is compensating for psychophysically measured channel interactions in cochlear implant subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141354     DOI: 10.1121/1.1482073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Spatial extent of cochlear infrared neural stimulation determined by tone-on-light masking.

Authors:  Agnella Izzo Matic; Joseph T Walsh; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Optical parameter variability in laser nerve stimulation: a study of pulse duration, repetition rate, and wavelength.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; E Duco Jansen; Mark Bendett; Jim Webb; Heather Ralph; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Laser stimulation of auditory neurons: effect of shorter pulse duration and penetration depth.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; Heather Ralph; Jim Webb; Mark Bendett; Jonathon Wells; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Simultaneous grouping in cochlear implant listeners: can abrupt changes in level be used to segregate components from a complex tone?

Authors:  Huw R Cooper; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-14

6.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  Marc D Eisen; Kevin H Franck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

8.  Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Meisam K Arjmandi; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

9.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Neural stimulation with optical radiation.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Agnella Izzo Matic; Jonathon D Wells; E Duco Jansen; Joseph T Walsh
Journal:  Laser Photon Rev       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 13.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.