Literature DB >> 9286688

Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution.

J Ehrlich1, D Sankoff, J H Nadeau.   

Abstract

An important problem in comparative genome analysis has been defining reliable measures of synteny conservation. The published analytical measures of synteny conservation have limitations. Nonindependence of comparisons, conserved and disrupted syntenies that are as yet unidentified, and redundant rearrangements lead to systematic errors that tend to overestimate the degree of conservation. We recently derived methods to estimate the total number of conserved syntenies within the genome, counting both those that have already been described and those that remain to be discovered. With this method, we show that approximately 65% of the conserved syntenies have already been identified for humans and mice, that rates of synteny disruption vary approximately 25-fold among mammalian lineages, and that despite strong selection against reciprocal translocations, inter-chromosome rearrangements occurred approximately fourfold more often than inversions and other intra-chromosome rearrangements, at least for lineages leading to humans and mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9286688      PMCID: PMC1208112     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  17 in total

1.  Comparative genome organization of vertebrates. The First International Workshop on Comparative Genome Organization.

Authors:  L Andersson; A Archibald; M Ashburner; S Audun; W Barendse; J Bitgood; C Bottema; T Broad; S Brown; D Burt; C Charlier; N Copeland; S Davis; M Davisson; J Edwards; A Eggen; G Elgar; J T Eppig; I Franklin; P Grewe; T Gill; J A Graves; R Hawken; J Hetzel; J Womack
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Genome sequence comparison and scenarios for gene rearrangements: a test case.

Authors:  S Hannenhalli; C Chappey; E V Koonin; P A Pevzner
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-11-20       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 3.  Analytical approaches to genomic evolution.

Authors:  D Sankoff
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.079

4.  Comparative anchor tagged sequences (CATS) for integrative mapping of mammalian genomes.

Authors:  L A Lyons; T F Laughlin; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; J E Womack; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  A genetic linkage map of the mouse: current applications and future prospects.

Authors:  N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; D J Gilbert; J T Eppig; L J Maltais; J C Miller; W F Dietrich; A Weaver; S E Lincoln; R G Steen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals.

Authors:  H Scherthan; T Cremer; U Arnason; H U Weier; A Lima-de-Faria; L Frönicke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A Rosetta stone of mammalian genetics.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; P L Grant; S Mankala; A H Reiner; J E Richardson; J T Eppig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting.

Authors:  G Rettenberger; C Klett; U Zechner; J Kunz; W Vogel; H Hameister
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-03-20       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  A contravention of Ohno's law in mice.

Authors:  S Palmer; J Perry; A Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Different chromosomal localization of the Clcn4 gene in Mus spretus and C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  E I Rugarli; D A Adler; G Borsani; K Tsuchiya; B Franco; X Hauge; C Disteche; V Chapman; A Ballabio
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  37 in total

1.  Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses.

Authors:  B S Gaut
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Comparative genomics, marker density and statistical analysis of chromosome rearrangements.

Authors:  D J Schoen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A chromosome-based model for estimating the number of conserved segments between pairs of species from comparative genetic maps.

Authors:  D Waddington; A J Springbett; D W Burt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Determination of the number of conserved chromosomal segments between species.

Authors:  S Kumar; S R Gadagkar; A Filipski; X Gu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Conserved vertebrate chromosome segments in the large salamander genome.

Authors:  S R Voss; J J Smith; D M Gardiner; D M Parichy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Natural killer cells and their receptors in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gurman Kaur; John Trowsdale; Lars Fugger
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Molecular phylogeny and functional genomics of beta-galactoside alpha2,6-sialyltransferases that explain ubiquitous expression of st6gal1 gene in amniotes.

Authors:  Daniel Petit; Anne-Marie Mir; Jean-Michel Petit; Christine Thisse; Philippe Delannoy; Rafael Oriol; Bernard Thisse; Anne Harduin-Lepers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Radiation hybrid map of the porcine genome comprising 2035 EST loci.

Authors:  Anette Rink; Katie Eyer; Benjamin Roelofs; Kimberly J Priest; Kathleen J Sharkey-Brockmeier; Sudkamon Lekhong; Elif K Karajusuf; Jason Bang; Martine Yerle; Denis Milan; Wan-Sheng Liu; Craig W Beattie
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Measures of synteny conservation between species pairs.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ann Housworth; John Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comparative genomic analysis of teleost fish bmal genes.

Authors:  Han Wang
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.