Literature DB >> 15867430

Conservation of regulatory sequences and gene expression patterns in the disintegrating Drosophila Hox gene complex.

Bárbara Negre1, Sònia Casillas, Magali Suzanne, Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero, Michael Akam, Michael Nefedov, Antonio Barbadilla, Pieter de Jong, Alfredo Ruiz.   

Abstract

Homeotic (Hox) genes are usually clustered and arranged in the same order as they are expressed along the anteroposterior body axis of metazoans. The mechanistic explanation for this colinearity has been elusive, and it may well be that a single and universal cause does not exist. The Hox-gene complex (HOM-C) has been rearranged differently in several Drosophila species, producing a striking diversity of Hox gene organizations. We investigated the genomic and functional consequences of the two HOM-C splits present in Drosophila buzzatii. Firstly, we sequenced two regions of the D. buzzatii genome, one containing the genes labial and abdominal A, and another one including proboscipedia, and compared their organization with that of D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura in order to map precisely the two splits. Then, a plethora of conserved noncoding sequences, which are putative enhancers, were identified around the three Hox genes closer to the splits. The position and order of these enhancers are conserved, with minor exceptions, between the three Drosophila species. Finally, we analyzed the expression patterns of the same three genes in embryos and imaginal discs of four Drosophila species with different Hox-gene organizations. The results show that their expression patterns are conserved despite the HOM-C splits. We conclude that, in Drosophila, Hox-gene clustering is not an absolute requirement for proper function. Rather, the organization of Hox genes is modular, and their clustering seems the result of phylogenetic inertia more than functional necessity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15867430      PMCID: PMC1088297          DOI: 10.1101/gr.3468605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  63 in total

1.  Evolutionary conservation of regulatory elements in vertebrate Hox gene clusters.

Authors:  Simona Santini; Jeffrey L Boore; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Authors:  M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Genescript: DNA sequence annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Alexander K Hudek; Joseph Cheung; Andrew P Boright; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Viewing and annotating sequence data with Artemis.

Authors:  Matt Berriman; Kim Rutherford
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 5.  Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan.

Authors:  Cynthia L Hughes; Thomas C Kaufman
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Automated finishing with autofinish.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Desmarais; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  A Hox gene mutation that triggers nonsense-mediated RNA decay and affects alternative splicing during Drosophila development.

Authors:  Claudio R Alonso; Michael Akam
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Rapid sequence turnover at an intergenic locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  An ancient genomic regulatory block conserved across bilaterians and its dismantling in tetrapods by retrogene replacement.

Authors:  Ignacio Maeso; Manuel Irimia; Juan J Tena; Esther González-Pérez; David Tran; Vydianathan Ravi; Byrappa Venkatesh; Sonsoles Campuzano; José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Disparate expression specificities coded by a shared Hox-C enhancer.

Authors:  Steve W Miller; James W Posakony
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  A BAC-based physical map of the Drosophila buzzatii genome.

Authors:  Josefa González; Michael Nefedov; Ian Bosdet; Ferran Casals; Oriol Calvete; Alejandra Delprat; Heesun Shin; Readman Chiu; Carrie Mathewson; Natasja Wye; Roger A Hoskins; Jacqueline E Schein; Pieter de Jong; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Fast sequence evolution of Hox and Hox-derived genes in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Sònia Casillas; Bárbara Negre; Antonio Barbadilla; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Intronic elements in the Na+/I- symporter gene (NIS) interact with retinoic acid receptors and mediate initiation of transcription.

Authors:  Hani Alotaibi; Elif Yaman; Domenico Salvatore; Valeria Di Dato; Pelin Telkoparan; Roberto Di Lauro; Uygar H Tazebay
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The transposon Galileo generates natural chromosomal inversions in Drosophila by ectopic recombination.

Authors:  Alejandra Delprat; Bàrbara Negre; Marta Puig; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Protein polymorphism is negatively correlated with conservation of intronic sequences and complexity of expression patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Natalia Petit; Sònia Casillas; Alfredo Ruiz; Antonio Barbadilla
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Retroviral enhancer detection insertions in zebrafish combined with comparative genomics reveal genomic regulatory blocks - a fundamental feature of vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kikuta; David Fredman; Silke Rinkwitz; Boris Lenhard; Thomas S Becker
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Analysis of the Tribolium homeotic complex: insights into mechanisms constraining insect Hox clusters.

Authors:  Teresa D Shippy; Matthew Ronshaugen; Jessica Cande; Jianping He; Richard W Beeman; Michael Levine; Susan J Brown; Robin E Denell
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 0.900

10.  Inferring genome-scale rearrangement phylogeny and ancestral gene order: a Drosophila case study.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; William M Gelbart; Temple F Smith
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.