Literature DB >> 19093093

[Audiometric thresholds estimated by auditory steady-state responses. Influence of EEG amplitude and test duration on accuracy].

R Mühler1, T Rahne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of electroencephalogram (EEG) amplitude, test duration, and residual noise on the definition of threshold criteria for auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) in three representative populations.
METHODS: EEG recordings from 61 patients, 11 sedated babies, and 53 relaxed volunteers were used in an offline analysis that calculated the mean EEG amplitude and the time course of residual noise. Additionally, the time course of residual noise and the test duration for a fixed level of residual noise were estimated from the mean EEG amplitude using the "square root of N" law of averaging.
RESULTS: A strong correlation between measured and predicted residual noise was found in all three groups. The mean EEG amplitude as well as the predicted test duration for a fixed residual noise level differed significantly among the three groups, with EEG amplitudes in clinical patients being four times greater than in relaxed volunteers.
CONCLUSIONS: The strong correlation between EEG amplitude, test duration, and residual noise in ASSR recordings allows for the prediction of individual test duration or residual noise levels in advanced testing algorithms. This study found that high mean EEG amplitudes in awake patients considerably reduce the accuracy of hearing thresholds estimated by ASSR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19093093     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-008-1849-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  25 in total

1.  [Dependence of "amplitude modulation following response" on attention].

Authors:  J Pethe; R Mühler; H von Specht
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  A T Herdman; D R Stapells
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  2001

3.  Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; David K Stapells
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli.

Authors:  M Sasha John; David W Purcell; Andrew Dimitrijevic; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Dani Tomlin; Field W Rickards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Test accuracy and prognostic validity of multiple auditory steady state responses for targeted hearing screening.

Authors:  Guillermo Savio; Maria Cecilia Perez-Abalo; Jose Gaya; Odelaysis Hernandez; Eleina Mijares
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Field Rickards
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  [Steady-state responses of the auditory system: a comparison of different methods].

Authors:  S Liebler; S Hoth; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  Human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Terence W Picton; M Sasha John; Andrew Dimitrijevic; David Purcell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  6 in total

1.  [On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  ADANO recommendations for the selection of target parameters and measurement processes for the use of auditory evoked potentials, otoacoustic emissions, and impedance audiometry in clinical trials : Prepared by the ERA consortium (AG-ERA)* of ADANO#. Confirmed by the board of ADANO on 18.01.2019.

Authors:  T Rahne; O Dziemba; A Lodwig; D Polterauer; R Thie; M Walger; T Wesarg; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Objective diagnostic methods in pediatric audiology].

Authors:  R Mühler; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns: implementation in clinical routine.

Authors:  David Ulrich Seidel; Tobias Angelo Flemming; Jonas Jae-Hyun Park; Stephan Remmert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.