Literature DB >> 18937280

Intra-operative monitoring of cochlear function during cochlear implantation.

John S Oghalai1, Ross Tonini, Jamie Rasmus, Claudia Emery, Spiros Manolidis, Jeffrey T Vrabec, Joann Haymond.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if intra-operative auditory monitoring is feasible during cochlear implantation and whether this can be used as feedback to the surgeon to improve the preservation of residual hearing. This prospective non-randomised study was set in a paediatric tertiary referral hospital. Thirty eight consecutive paediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation who had measurable auditory thresholds pre-operatively were divided into two cohorts. The unmonitored cohort included the first 22 patients and the monitored cohort included the last 16 patients. The main outcome measure(s) were pre-operative, intra-operative and more than one month post-operative average auditory thresholds at 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz measured using auditory steady-state response audiometry. The average pre-operative thresholds were 103.5 dB HL and 99.7 dB HL in the unmonitored and monitored cohorts, respectively. These were not statistically different (p > 0.3). In the monitored cohort, we measured auditory thresholds to assess cochlear function at multiple time points during the operation. Compared to baseline, thresholds were increased 0.7 dB after drilling the mastoidectomy and well, 0.2 dB after opening the cochlea and 4.6 dB after inserting the electrode array. One month post-operatively, the average thresholds were 114.0 dB HL in the unmonitored cohort but only 98.8 dB HL in the monitored cohort (p < 0.001). Both the use of intra-operative auditory monitoring and higher pre-operative thresholds were associated with improved preservation of residual hearing (p <or= 0.001). Intra-operative auditory monitoring is a viable tool that can provide real-time feedback to the surgeon during cochlear implant surgery. These data suggest that this can lead the surgeon to modify his or her surgical technique in ways that can improve the rate of long-term hearing preservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18937280      PMCID: PMC3597106          DOI: 10.1002/cii.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays.

Authors:  M Tykocinski; L T Cohen; B C Pyman; T Roland; C Treaba; J Palamara; M C Dahm; R K Shepherd; J Xu; R S Cowan; N L Cohen; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; M Sasha John; Patricia Van Roon; David W Purcell; Julija Adamonis; Jodi Ostroff; Julian M Nedzelski; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The auditory steady-state response: full-term and premature neonates.

Authors:  Barbara Cone-Wesson; John Parker; Nina Swiderski; Field Rickards
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: the Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Robert J S Briggs
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05

5.  The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Barbara Cone-Wesson; Richard C Dowell; Dani Tomlin; Gary Rance; Wu Jia Ming
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study.

Authors:  Henryk Skarzyński; Artur Lorens; Patrick D'Haese; Adam Walkowiak; Anna Piotrowska; Lech Sliwa; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  Comparison of auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Carolyn J Brown; Barbara A Gienapp; Kelly M Schmidt Clay
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Field Rickards
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  The auditory steady-state response: clinical observations and applications in infants and children.

Authors:  Barbara Cone-Wesson; Field Rickards; Christine Poulis; John Parker; Lesley Tan; Jan Pollard
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing.

Authors:  Wai Na Yao; Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  10 in total

1.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Osmotic stabilization prevents cochlear synaptopathy after blast trauma.

Authors:  Jinkyung Kim; Anping Xia; Nicolas Grillet; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

4.  Towards an etiologic diagnosis: assessing the patient with hearing loss.

Authors:  J Jerry; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-24

5.  Neuroimaging with near-infrared spectroscopy demonstrates speech-evoked activity in the auditory cortex of deaf children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Alexander B G Sevy; Heather Bortfeld; Theodore J Huppert; Michael S Beauchamp; Ross E Tonini; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Characteristics of malfunctioning channels in pediatric cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jerry W Lin; Avni Mody; Ross Tonini; Claudia Emery; Jody Haymond; Jeffrey T Vrabec; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 7.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Joe Saliba; Heather Bortfeld; Daniel J Levitin; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Priscila Carvalho Miranda; André Luiz Lopes Sampaio; Rafaela Aquino Fernandes Lopes; Alessandra Ramos Venosa; Carlos Augusto Costa Pires de Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-03

Review 9.  Intra-operative hearing monitoring methods in middle ear surgeries.

Authors:  Wei Ren; Fei Ji; Jialing Zeng; Hui Zhao
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-02-08

10.  Effect of Depth of Total Intravenous General Anesthesia on Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials in Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

Authors:  Ala A Alhowary; Abdelwahab Aleshawi; Obada Alali; Manal Kassab; Diab Bani Hani; Khaled El-Radaideh; Firas Alzoubi
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.