Literature DB >> 12098053

Male gender: risk factor for severe symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Heng-Hui Lein1, Ching-Shui Huang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of male gender on the clinical presentation of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been accepted as standard procedure for the management of symptomatic cholelithiasis even when the gallbladder is acutely inflamed. With the accumulated experience in the management of acute cholecystitis, some factors including male gender were recognized to influence the clinical presentation of symptomatic cholelithiasis and increase the conversion rate during LC. This retrospective study tried to clarify the correlation between male gender and the clinical presentation of symptomatic cholelithiasis. The medical records of all patients presenting with symptomatic cholelithiasis from January 1994 to August 1999 were evaluated. These cases were divided into four groups as follows: (1) elective LC group: patients with a history of biliary colic or acute attack of cholecystitis but whose LC was performed electively without any inflammatory change in the gallbladder during operation; (2) acute LC group: patients presenting with acute cholecystitis, and LC was performed successfully without conversion; (3) acute conversion group: patients who underwent LC during the course of acute cholecystitis but the procedure were disturbed by severe inflammatory change so they were converted to open surgery; (4) acute open group: patients whose acute cholecystitis was managed by direct open surgery due to the preoperative prediction that LC would not succeed. The correlation of gender, age, and operating time were assessed among these four groups. We found that: (1) the male/female ratio increased (in the patient group sequence of simple LC, acute LC, acute open, and acute conversion group); (2) in the acute LC group male patients had significantly (p = 0.04, t-test) longer operating time than females; (3) although there was no significant difference between the mean age of male (55.7 +/- 13.4) and female (56.3 +/- 15.7) patients in the acute cholecystitis groups (i.e., all patients in the acute LC, acute conversion, and acute open groups), the distribution curve by age in male patients showed a significantly shift to a younger age compared with female patients (p = 0.009, Fisher's exact test).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098053     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0275-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  19 in total

1.  Risk factors for intraoperative injury during cholecystectomy: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Authors:  L W Traverso
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the evolution of general surgery.

Authors:  J V White
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Symptomatic cholelithiasis: a different disease in men? Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholesystectomy Registry.

Authors:  J C Russell; S J Walsh; L Reed-Fourquet; A Mattie; J Lynch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study.

Authors:  D R Fletcher; M S Hobbs; P Tan; L J Valinsky; R L Hockey; T J Pikora; M W Knuiman; H J Sheiner; A Edis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. What is the optimal timing for operation?

Authors:  K P Koo; R C Thirlby
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-05

6.  General surgery.

Authors:  P Twomey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder.

Authors:  M R Cox; T G Wilson; A J Luck; P L Jeans; R T Padbury; J Toouli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G M Fried; J S Barkun; H H Sigman; L Joseph; D Clas; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J R Sanabria; S Gallinger; R Croxford; S M Strasberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Developing trends in acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  F Glenn; L D Dillon
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-10
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder perforation.

Authors:  Hayrullah Derici; Cemal Kara; Ali-Dogan Bozdag; Okay Nazli; Tugrul Tansug; Esra Akca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Preoperative prediction of difficult lap chole: a scoring method.

Authors:  Jaskiran S Randhawa; Aswini K Pujahari
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

6.  Does the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Differ Between Genders?

Authors:  Adem Akcakaya; Ismail Okan; Gurhan Bas; Gurol Sahin; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Predicting Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Single Institution Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Samer Al Masri; Yaser Shaib; Mostapha Edelbi; Hani Tamim; Faek Jamali; Nicholas Batley; Walid Faraj; Ali Hallal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with empyematous cholecystitis: an outcome analysis.

Authors:  Constantinos Simopoulos; Sotirios Botaitis; Alexandros Polychronidis; Grigorios Trypsianis; Sebachedin Perente; Michail Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  The use of patient factors to improve the prediction of operative duration using laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Cornelius A Thiels; Denny Yu; Amro M Abdelrahman; Elizabeth B Habermann; Susan Hallbeck; Kalyan S Pasupathy; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Prediction of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery with artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Changiz Gholipour; Mohammad Bassir Abolghasemi Fakhree; Rosita Alizadeh Shalchi; Mehrshad Abbasi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.