Literature DB >> 16843880

Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Benjie Tang1, Alfred Cuschieri.   

Abstract

In view of the substantial, at times conflicting, literature on conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), we have considered it timely to review the subject to identify the risk factors for conversion and its consequences. The review is based on a complete literature search covering the period 1990 to 2005. The search identified 109 publications on the subject: 68 retrospective series, 16 prospective nonrandomized studies, 8 prospective randomized clinical trials, 5 prospective case-controlled studies, 5 reviews and 7 others (3 observational, 2 population-based studies, 1 national survey, and 1 editorial). As the majority of reported studies are retrospective, firm conclusions cannot be reached. Single factors that appear to be important include male gender, extreme old age, morbid obesity, cirrhosis, previous upper abdominal surgery, severe/advanced acute and chronic disease, and emergency LC. The combination of patient- and disease-related risk factors increases the conversion risk. In the training of residents, the number of cases needed for reaching proficiency exceeds 200 cases. The value of predictive scoring systems is important in the selection of cases for resident training. Conversion exerts adverse effects on operating time, postoperative morbidity, and hospital costs, especially when it is enforced. There appears to be no absolute contraindication to LC that is agreed upon by all. There is consensus on certain individual risk factors and their additive effect on the likelihood of conversion. Predictive systems based on these factors appear to be useful in selection of cases for resident training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16843880     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  107 in total

1.  Changing trends in the management of gallstone disease.

Authors:  S M Johnston; S Kidney; K J Sweeney; A Zaki; W A Tanner; F V Keane
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution from 1993 and current state.

Authors:  Francesco Domenico Capizzi; Luciano Fogli; Mauro Brulatti; Sergio Boschi; Marco Di Domenico; Vito Papa; Patrizio Patrizi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Edward Taylor; Charles Wong
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Analysis of errors enacted by surgical trainees during skills training courses.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  [Cholecystectomy with celioscopy. 330 cases].

Authors:  F Dubois; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1990

6.  Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  F A Habib; R B Kolachalam; R Khilnani; O Preventza; V K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Incidence and management of Mirizzi syndrome during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Schäfer; R Schneiter; L Krähenbühl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Surgery for gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  C A Pellegrini
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  E Cucinotta; S Lazzara; G Melita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  T Kiviluoto; J Sirén; P Luukkonen; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  37 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Dan Azagury; Oliver Varban; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; David C Brooks; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A 10-step intraoperative surgical checklist (ISC) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-can it really reduce conversion rates to open cholecystectomy?

Authors:  William B Robb; Gavin A Falk; John O Larkin; Ronan Waldron; Ronan P Waldron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the presence of common bile duct stent.

Authors:  Manojkumar S Nair; Mohammed Mohsin Uzzaman; Oladapo Fafemi; Anna Athow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England.

Authors:  Abdulzahra Hussain; Yazan Masannat; Hussein Almusawy; Prakash Sinha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The impact of body mass index on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Daniel T Farkas; Dovid Moradi; David Moaddel; Kamal Nagpal; John Morgan Cosgrove
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009.

Authors:  Murad Aljiffry; Mark J Walsh; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  [Minimally invasive surgical therapy of acute cholecystitis].

Authors:  W Hartwig; A Gluth; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Do height and weight affect the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Hélène Meillat; David Jérémie Birnbaum; Régis Fara; Julien Mancini; Stéphane Berdah; Thierry Bège
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Herng-Chia Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.