Literature DB >> 8239777

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder.

M R Cox1, T G Wilson, A J Luck, P L Jeans, R T Padbury, J Toouli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute inflammation of the gallbladder. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard treatment for symptomatic gallbladder disease. Its role in the surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis has not been defined, although a number of recent reports suggest that there should be few contraindications to an initial laparoscopic approach.
METHODS: All patients presenting with symptomatic cholelithiasis from October 1990 until June 1992 were evaluated at laparoscopy with intention of proceeding to a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The gross appearance of the gallbladder was categorized as acute inflammation, chronic inflammation, or no inflammation. Ninety-eight (23.4%) of 418 patients had acute inflammation of the gallbladder: 55 were edematous, 10 were gangrenous, 15 had a mucocele, and 18 had an empyema.
RESULTS: The authors assessed outcome in these patients. The frequency of conversion to an open operation was 33.7% for acute inflammation, 21.7% for chronic inflammation (p < 0.05), and 4% for no inflammation (p < 0.001). The conversion rate was highest for empyema (83.3%) and gangrenous cholecystitis (50%), while the conversion rate for edematous cholecystitis was 21.8% and for acute inflammation with a mucocele it was 7%. The median operation time for successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation was 105 minutes, which was longer than that with no inflammation (90 minutes). However, the incidence of complications was not different from that for chronic or no inflammation. The median postoperative stay for patients with acute gallbladder inflammation was 2 days for successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 7 days for patients converted to an open operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder is safe and is associated with a significantly shorter postoperative stay compared to open surgery. A greater number of patients required conversion to open operation compared to those with no obvious inflammation. Conversion to open operation was most frequent for empyema and gangrenous cholecystitis, suggesting that once this diagnosis is made, excessive time should not be spent in laparoscopic trial dissection before converting to an open operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8239777      PMCID: PMC1243033          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199321850-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  Controlled clinical trial comparing early with interval cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  P McArthur; A Cuschieri; R A Sells; R Shields
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Safe performance of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D Olsen; A Spaw; D Baird; H Asbun; M O'Reilly; K Fisher; W Saye
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  R A Gingrich; W C Awe; A M Boyden; C G Peterson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Cholecystectomy: clinical experience with a large series.

Authors:  J B Ganey; P A Johnson; P E Prillaman; G R McSwain
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Urgent and early cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease.

Authors:  N V Addison; P J Finan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Early or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial.

Authors:  S Norrby; P Herlin; T Holmin; R Sjödahl; C Tagesson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long-term relief of symptoms.

Authors:  T M Gilliland; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-01

9.  Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; J Hästbacka
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  46 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study.

Authors:  A Brodsky; I Matter; E Sabo; A Cohen; J Abrahamson; S Eldar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mikael Johansson; A Thune; A Blomqvist; L Nelvin; L Lundell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change.

Authors:  I C Cameron; C Chadwick; J Phillips; A G Johnson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Original single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Kazunari Sasaki; Goro Watanabe; Masamichi Matsuda; Masaji Hashimoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S B Kolla; S Aggarwal; A Kumar; R Kumar; S Chumber; R Parshad; V Seenu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Implementation of a scoring system for assessing difficult cholecystectomies in a single center.

Authors:  Nurullah Bulbuller; Yavuz Selim Ilhan; Ahmet Baktir; Cuneyt Kirkil; Osman Dogru
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Shu-Hung Chuang; Pai-Hsi Chen; Chih-Ming Chang; Chih-Sheng Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in a district general hospital - is it feasible?

Authors:  M N Khan; I Nordon; A S K Ghauri; C Ranaboldo; N Carty
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.