Literature DB >> 26730044

Does the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Differ Between Genders?

Adem Akcakaya1, Ismail Okan2, Gurhan Bas3, Gurol Sahin4, Mustafa Sahin2.   

Abstract

Some studies have shown that severe fibrosis and anatomical anomalies are more common in men, and subsequently, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more difficult in male than female patients. We aimed to evaluate the effect of gender in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with regard to the conversion rate, the differences in histological inflammation severity, and anatomical difficulty. We reviewed retrospectively 915 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the First Department of General Surgery at Vakif Gureba Training and Research Hospital. Patients were divided into male (group 1) and female (group 2) groups. Both groups were compared with demographic criteria, the type of inflammation found on resected gallbladder, anatomical difficulty, gallbladder perforation during the operation, length of operation time, conversion rate, and omental and organ adhesions to the gallbladder. Of the 915 patients, 173 patients (19 %) were males (group 1), and 742 (81 %) were females (group 2). Mean age was 53 ± 12 (range 22 to 80) years in group 1 and 49 ± 13 (range 17 to 85) years in group 2. The average duration of surgery was 71 ± 33 min (range 20 to 160) in group 1 and 58 ± 27 min (range 15 to 135) in group 2 (p < 0.001). The conversion rate between groups was significantly different (p < 0.05). Inflammatory findings (acute or chronic) in resected gallbladder between groups 1 and 2 were significantly different (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). The frequency of adhesions between the gallbladder and omentum and other organs was higher in male (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0006, respectively). Anatomical difficulty was more prominent in male patients (p < 0.0001). The findings of higher scores of anatomical difficulty in operation and inflammation in cholecystectomy specimens, as well as higher rates of conversion in males, suggested that laparoscopic gallbladder surgery is more difficult in men.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion; Gender; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Operation time

Year:  2013        PMID: 26730044      PMCID: PMC4692907          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-0872-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  24 in total

1.  Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C Simopoulos; S Botaitis; A Polychronidis; G Tripsianis; A J Karayiannakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preoperative evaluation to predict technical difficulties of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the basis of histological inflammation findings on resected gallbladder.

Authors:  S Sakuramoto; S Sato; T Okuri; K Sato; Y Hiki; A Kakita
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The effect of testosterone propionate on wound healing in normal and castrate rats.

Authors:  R C Shamberger; P A Thistlethwaite; L E Thibault; T L Talbot; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Kologlu; M Doganay; E Reis; M Atli; M Dolapci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The effect of the degree of histologic inflammation on gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Gurhan Bas; Ramazan Eryilmaz; Adem Akcakaya; Emin Daldal; Orhan Alimoglu; Ismail Okan; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samer A Kanaan; Kenric M Murayama; Louis T Merriam; Lillian G Dawes; Jay B Prystowsky; Robert V Rege; Raymond J Joehl
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Male gender: risk factor for severe symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Heng-Hui Lein; Ching-Shui Huang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G M Fried; J S Barkun; H H Sigman; L Joseph; D Clas; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--can conversion be predicted?

Authors:  S S Sikora; A Kumar; R Saxena; V K Kapoor; S P Kaushik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Retrospective and Prospective Study to Develop a Pre-operative Difficulty Score for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yousef Ibrahim; Rami W Radwan; Ali Adel Ne'ma Abdullah; Mohamed Sherif; Usman Khalid; James Ansell; Ashraf Rasheed
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Surgical site infection following abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study

Authors:  Aroub Alkaaki; Osman O. Al-Radi; Ahmad Khoja; Anfal Alnawawi; Abrar Alnawawi; Ashraf Maghrabi; Abdulmalik Altaf; Murad Aljiffry
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Port Site Consequences After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using an Open Versus Closed Approach of Pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Awni Ismail Sultan; Sami Hassoon Ali; Ozdan Akram Ghareeb
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  Is a difficult gallbladder worth removing in its entirety? - Outcomes of subtotal cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kushal Bairoliya; Ramesh Rajan; R S Sindhu; Bonny Natesh; Jacob Mathew; S Raviram
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.