Literature DB >> 9488516

Symptomatic cholelithiasis: a different disease in men? Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholesystectomy Registry.

J C Russell1, S J Walsh, L Reed-Fourquet, A Mattie, J Lynch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of gender in the clinical presentation and subsequent clinical outcome (risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open technique and risk of postoperative mortality) for patients undergoing cholecystectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Age and clinical presentation have consistently been found to be important predictors of cholecystectomy outcomes; male gender has been cited in disparate studies as possibly having prognostic significance.
METHOD: A statewide cholecystectomy registry (30,145 cases between 1989-1993) was analyzed. Hierarchical log-linear modeling was used to identify associations between characteristics of clinical presentation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictions of conversion and mortality.
RESULTS: Male gender was associated with twice the expected incidence of acute cholecystitis and pancreatitis in the elderly (> or = 65 years). Males had a significantly increased risk for conversion to open technique, but this decreased during the time frame of the study. Mortality was twice as high among males (confidence interval, 1.4-2.9, p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Males presenting for cholecystectomy are more likely to have severe disease. Independent of clinical presentation, they face increased risks of conversion to open technique and of postoperative mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9488516      PMCID: PMC1191235          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  Gallbladder disease in the aged.

Authors:  A HORWITZ
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1956-07-21

2.  Prognosis of gallstones with mild or no symptoms: 25 years of follow-up in a health maintenance organization.

Authors:  G D Friedman; C A Raviola; B Fireman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  J A MacDonald
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1974-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Cholecystectomy in the aged.

Authors:  J R Ibach; H A Hume; W H Erb
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1968-03

Review 5.  Surgical therapy for gallstone disease.

Authors:  L A Wetter; L W Way
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  N Gagic; C F Frey; R Gaines
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-06

7.  Acute cholecystitis in the elderly: a surgical emergency.

Authors:  D J Morrow; J Thompson; S E Wilson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1978-10

8.  Cholecystectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  S J Margiotta; J R Horwitz; I H Willis; M K Wallack
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Developing trends in acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  F Glenn; L D Dillon
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-10

10.  The economic costs of illness: a replication and update.

Authors:  D P Rice; T A Hodgson; A N Kopstein
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1985
View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  S A Ahrendt
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-04

2.  Connecticut RxData project.

Authors:  Michael K Martin; Keith P Shuster; Thomas G Palisano
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Lincey C F de Nes; Pieter G Versluis; Joris Derksen; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Preoperative prediction of difficult lap chole: a scoring method.

Authors:  Jaskiran S Randhawa; Aswini K Pujahari
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Sex differences in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Simon E Thesbjerg; Kirstine M Harboe; Linda Bardram; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

Review 8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome.

Authors:  U Giger; J M Michel; R Vonlanthen; K Becker; T Kocher; L Krähenbühl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Does the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Differ Between Genders?

Authors:  Adem Akcakaya; Ismail Okan; Gurhan Bas; Gurol Sahin; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; O van Ruler; L M Dijksman; A A van Geloven; E G Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.