Literature DB >> 29417247

Predicting Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Single Institution Retrospective Study.

Samer Al Masri1, Yaser Shaib2, Mostapha Edelbi1, Hani Tamim2, Faek Jamali1, Nicholas Batley3, Walid Faraj1,4, Ali Hallal5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard surgical treatment for benign gallbladder disease. Nevertheless, conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) is needed in some cases. The aim of this study is to calculate our institutional conversion rate and to identify the variables that are implicated in increasing the risk of conversion (LC-OC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of all cases of LC performed at the American University of Beirut Medical Center between 2000 and 2015. Each (LC-OC) case was randomly matched to a laparoscopically completed case by the same consultant within the same year of practice, as the LC-OC case, in a 1:5 ratio. Forty-eight parameters were compared between the two study groups.
RESULTS: Forty-eight out of 4668 LC were converted to OC over the 15-year study period; the conversion rate in our study was 1.03%. The variables that were found to be most predictive of conversion were male gender, advanced age, prior history of laparotomy, especially in the setting of prior gunshot wound, a history of restrictive or constrictive lung disease and anemia (Hb < 9 g/dl). The most common intraoperative reasons for conversion were perceived difficult anatomy or obscured view secondary to severe adhesions or significant inflammation. Patients who were in the LC-OC arm had a longer length of hospital stay.
CONCLUSION: Advance age, male gender, significant comorbidities and history of prior laparotomies have a high risk of conversion. Patients with these risk factors should be counseled for the possibility of conversion to open surgery preoperatively. Further research is needed to determine whether these high risks patients should be operated on by surgeons with more extensive experience in minimal invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29417247     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4513-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  38 in total

1.  Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: an 11-year experience in one institute.

Authors:  Theodoros Diamantis; Christos Tsigris; Andreas Kiriakopoulos; Efstathios Papalambros; John Bramis; Panagiotis Michail; Evangelos Felekouras; John Griniatsos; Theofilos Rosenberg; Nikolaos Kalahanis; Athanassios Giannopoulos; Christos Bakoyiannis; Elias Bastounis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

3.  Role of preoperative sonography in predicting conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery.

Authors:  Alptekin Tosun; Kadir Oymen Hancerliogullari; Ismail Serifoglu; Yavuz Capan; Enis Ozkaya
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  The difficult gall bladder: Outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the need for open conversion.

Authors:  A Ashfaq; K Ahmadieh; A A Shah; A B Chapital; K L Harold; D J Johnson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly.

Authors:  L M Brunt; M A Quasebarth; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Observational Studies: Matching or Regression?

Authors:  Ruta Brazauskas; Brent R Logan
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.

Authors:  Urs F Giger; Jean-Marie Michel; Isabelle Opitz; Devdas Th Inderbitzin; Thomas Kocher; Lukas Krähenbühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center.

Authors:  L F Williams; W C Chapman; R A Bonau; E C McGee; R W Boyd; J K Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later.

Authors:  Sujit Vijay Sakpal; Supreet Singh Bindra; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Prediction of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery with artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Changiz Gholipour; Mohammad Bassir Abolghasemi Fakhree; Rosita Alizadeh Shalchi; Mehrshad Abbasi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  3 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the right accessory hepatic duct diagnosed preoperatively: A case report.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsubara; Seiji Satoh; Atsushi Fukugaki; Yousuke Kinjo
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

2.  The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella; Angela Gurrado; Alessandro Pasculli; Nicola de Angelis; Riccardo Memeo; Francesco Paolo Prete; Stefano Berti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Marco Rigamonti; Francesco Giuseppe Aldo Badessi; Nicola Solari; Marco Milone; Fausto Catena; Stefano Scabini; Francesco Vittore; Gennaro Perrone; Carlo de Werra; Ferdinando Cafiero; Mario Testini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Analysis of Risk Factors in the Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Łukasz Warchałowski; Edyta Łuszczki; Anna Bartosiewicz; Katarzyna Dereń; Marta Warchałowska; Łukasz Oleksy; Artur Stolarczyk; Robert Podlasek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.