Literature DB >> 8412715

Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.

R D Melara1, J R Mounts.   

Abstract

The framework of dimensional interaction was used to test the hypothesis that the Stroop effect is partially rooted in mismatches in baseline discriminability, with stimulus differences along the word dimension typically exceeding stimulus differences along the color dimension. Subjects made speeded classifications, with either keypresses or vocalizations, of either words or colors. Stroop congruity and Garner interference were measured under conditions in which discriminabilities were (1) matched (Experiments 1 and 4), (2) mismatched in favor of colors (Experiment 2), or (3) mismatched in favor of words (Experiment 3). When matched, colors and words appeared separable, with small interactive effects being reduced or eliminated through practice. When mismatched, asymmetric Stroop and Garner effects emerged, with the more discriminable dimension disrupting classification of the less discriminable dimension. Asymmetric effects were obtained in both response modes, and were not alleviated by practice. We conclude that (1) the Stroop effect is an optional effect, and (2) unequal discriminability causes a mandatory failure of selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8412715     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  40 in total

1.  Processes underlying dimensional interactions: correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

2.  Dimensional interactions in language processing: investigating directions and levels of crosstalk.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'.

Authors:  J R Simon; K Berbaum
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-03

4.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The Stroop phenomenon: some critical tests of the response competition hypothesis.

Authors:  P M Nealis
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1973-08

6.  An iinvestigation into some of the underlying associative verbal processes of the Stroop colour effect.

Authors:  D Pritchatt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception.

Authors:  J R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-12

9.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Authors:  M O Glaser; W R Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task.

Authors:  R W Proctor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-05
View more
  33 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

3.  The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Avishai Henik; Idit Spitzer-Davidson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

4.  Holistic processing does not require configural variability.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

5.  Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

6.  Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Hyunsook Jang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-17

7.  A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty.

Authors:  Churs Blais; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

8.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

9.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task.

Authors:  Yoav Bar-Anan; Nira Liberman; Yaacov Trope; Daniel Algom
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.