OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer detection in biopsies increases with the number of sites and total tissue sampled. Its dependence on needle core fragment length is uncertain. METHODS: We surveyed two consecutive series of sextant needle biopsies from two practices in 1998 to 2000: 251 patients from Pennsylvania (group P) and 1596 from Virginia (group V). We tabulated the gross needle core lengths per sextant site and classified the diagnoses as benign or into four nonbenign categories: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; atypical small acinar proliferation, suspicious; atypical small acinar proliferation, suspicious plus high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; and cancer. Logistic regression analysis was used to correlate cancer or a nonbenign diagnosis with the total length (sum of six sites) and, after excluding the sites with more than one core, with the length per single core, and the anatomic site of origin (apex, mid-gland, base). RESULTS: The mean total tissue length sampled was 108 +/- 27 mm (range 30 to 275) in group P and 81 +/- 22 mm (range 30 to 228) in group V. Sextant sites with a single core contained a mean of 12.8 +/- 3.5 mm tissue, with a 3.6-fold variation among the middle 95%. Group V core lengths at the apex averaged 11.8 mm, shorter (P = 0.0001) than mid (13.3 mm) or base (12.7 mm). A predictive value of longer length for a nonbenign diagnosis was noted in four of six sextants (P <0.04), with trend strongest at the apex, for which detection was influenced by abnormal digital rectal examination (P = 0.02) or ultrasound (P = 0.04) findings. CONCLUSIONS: The length of single cores sampled by sextant biopsy can vary more than 3.6-fold and represents a quality assurance consideration. The effect of length on cancer or nonbenign detection was maximal at the prostatic apex where the cores were shortest.
OBJECTIVES:Prostate cancer detection in biopsies increases with the number of sites and total tissue sampled. Its dependence on needle core fragment length is uncertain. METHODS: We surveyed two consecutive series of sextant needle biopsies from two practices in 1998 to 2000: 251 patients from Pennsylvania (group P) and 1596 from Virginia (group V). We tabulated the gross needle core lengths per sextant site and classified the diagnoses as benign or into four nonbenign categories: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; atypical small acinar proliferation, suspicious; atypical small acinar proliferation, suspicious plus high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; and cancer. Logistic regression analysis was used to correlate cancer or a nonbenign diagnosis with the total length (sum of six sites) and, after excluding the sites with more than one core, with the length per single core, and the anatomic site of origin (apex, mid-gland, base). RESULTS: The mean total tissue length sampled was 108 +/- 27 mm (range 30 to 275) in group P and 81 +/- 22 mm (range 30 to 228) in group V. Sextant sites with a single core contained a mean of 12.8 +/- 3.5 mm tissue, with a 3.6-fold variation among the middle 95%. Group V core lengths at the apex averaged 11.8 mm, shorter (P = 0.0001) than mid (13.3 mm) or base (12.7 mm). A predictive value of longer length for a nonbenign diagnosis was noted in four of six sextants (P <0.04), with trend strongest at the apex, for which detection was influenced by abnormal digital rectal examination (P = 0.02) or ultrasound (P = 0.04) findings. CONCLUSIONS: The length of single cores sampled by sextant biopsy can vary more than 3.6-fold and represents a quality assurance consideration. The effect of length on cancer or nonbenign detection was maximal at the prostatic apex where the cores were shortest.
Authors: Th H van der Kwast; C Lopes; C Santonja; C-G Pihl; I Neetens; P Martikainen; S Di Lollo; L Bubendorf; R F Hoedemaeker Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Hasan Yılmaz; Ufuk Yavuz; Murat Üstüner; Seyfettin Çiftçi; Hikmet Yaşar; Bahar Müezzinoğlu; Ali Kemal Uslubaş; Özdal Dillioğlugil Journal: Turk J Urol Date: 2017-07-31
Authors: Leonardo O Reis; Brunno C F Sanches; Gustavo Borges de Mendonça; Daniel M Silva; Tiago Aguiar; Ocivaldo P Menezes; Athanase Billis Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Carlo Andrea Bravi; Emily Vertosick; Amy Tin; Simone Scuderi; Giuseppe Fallara; Giuseppe Rosiello; Elio Mazzone; Marco Bandini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Massimo Freschi; Rodolfo Montironi; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Andrew Vickers Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2018-11-24
Authors: Teemu T Tolonen; Jorma Isola; Antti Kaipia; Jarno Riikonen; Laura Koivusalo; Sanna Huovinen; Marita Laurila; Sinikka Porre; Mika Tirkkonen; Paula Kujala Journal: BMC Clin Pathol Date: 2015-03-08
Authors: Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Il Hwang; Sung Kyu Hong; Hak Jong Lee; Seok Soo Byun; Gheeyoung Choe; Sang Eun Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240