Literature DB >> 11992843

Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate.

Kenneth A Iczkowski1, George Casella, R John Seppala, Galin L Jones, Barbara A Mishler, Junqi Qian, David G Bostwick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer detection in biopsies increases with the number of sites and total tissue sampled. Its dependence on needle core fragment length is uncertain.
METHODS: We surveyed two consecutive series of sextant needle biopsies from two practices in 1998 to 2000: 251 patients from Pennsylvania (group P) and 1596 from Virginia (group V). We tabulated the gross needle core lengths per sextant site and classified the diagnoses as benign or into four nonbenign categories: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; atypical small acinar proliferation, suspicious; atypical small acinar proliferation, suspicious plus high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; and cancer. Logistic regression analysis was used to correlate cancer or a nonbenign diagnosis with the total length (sum of six sites) and, after excluding the sites with more than one core, with the length per single core, and the anatomic site of origin (apex, mid-gland, base).
RESULTS: The mean total tissue length sampled was 108 +/- 27 mm (range 30 to 275) in group P and 81 +/- 22 mm (range 30 to 228) in group V. Sextant sites with a single core contained a mean of 12.8 +/- 3.5 mm tissue, with a 3.6-fold variation among the middle 95%. Group V core lengths at the apex averaged 11.8 mm, shorter (P = 0.0001) than mid (13.3 mm) or base (12.7 mm). A predictive value of longer length for a nonbenign diagnosis was noted in four of six sextants (P <0.04), with trend strongest at the apex, for which detection was influenced by abnormal digital rectal examination (P = 0.02) or ultrasound (P = 0.04) findings.
CONCLUSIONS: The length of single cores sampled by sextant biopsy can vary more than 3.6-fold and represents a quality assurance consideration. The effect of length on cancer or nonbenign detection was maximal at the prostatic apex where the cores were shortest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992843     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01515-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

1.  Minimum 6 mm core length is strongly predictive for the presence of glandular tissue in transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hasan Yilmaz; Seyfettin Ciftci; Murat Ustuner; Ufuk Yavuz; Ali Saribacak; Bahar Muezzinoglu; Ozdal Dillioglugil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Does length of prostate biopsy cores have an impact on diagnosis of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Müslüm Ergün; Ekrem İslamoğlu; Soner Yalçınkaya; Hüsnü Tokgöz; Murat Savaş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies.

Authors:  Th H van der Kwast; C Lopes; C Santonja; C-G Pihl; I Neetens; P Martikainen; S Di Lollo; L Bubendorf; R F Hoedemaeker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Longer biopsy cores do not increase prostate cancer detection rate: A large-scale cohort study refuting cut-off values indicated in the literature.

Authors:  Hasan Yılmaz; Ufuk Yavuz; Murat Üstüner; Seyfettin Çiftçi; Hikmet Yaşar; Bahar Müezzinoğlu; Ali Kemal Uslubaş; Özdal Dillioğlugil
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

5.  Does needle calibre affect pain and complication rates in patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy? A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Giovanni Saredi; Saredi Giovanni; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Francesco Fidanza; Fidanza Francesco; Stefano De Stefani; De Stefani Stefano; Salvatore Micali; Micali Salvatore; Paterlini Maurizio; Maurizio Paterlini; Roberto D'Amico; Giampaolo Bianchi; Bianchi Giampaolo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Gleason underestimation is predicted by prostate biopsy core length.

Authors:  Leonardo O Reis; Brunno C F Sanches; Gustavo Borges de Mendonça; Daniel M Silva; Tiago Aguiar; Ocivaldo P Menezes; Athanase Billis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Relative Contribution of Sampling and Grading to the Quality of Prostate Biopsy: Results from a Single High-volume Institution.

Authors:  Carlo Andrea Bravi; Emily Vertosick; Amy Tin; Simone Scuderi; Giuseppe Fallara; Giuseppe Rosiello; Elio Mazzone; Marco Bandini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Massimo Freschi; Rodolfo Montironi; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-24

9.  Length of prostate biopsies is not necessarily compromised by pooling multiple cores in one paraffin block: an observational study.

Authors:  Teemu T Tolonen; Jorma Isola; Antti Kaipia; Jarno Riikonen; Laura Koivusalo; Sanna Huovinen; Marita Laurila; Sinikka Porre; Mika Tirkkonen; Paula Kujala
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-03-08

10.  Clinical value of core length in contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Il Hwang; Sung Kyu Hong; Hak Jong Lee; Seok Soo Byun; Gheeyoung Choe; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.