Hasan Yilmaz1, Seyfettin Ciftci2, Murat Ustuner1, Ufuk Yavuz1, Ali Saribacak3, Bahar Muezzinoglu4, Ozdal Dillioglugil1. 1. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey. 2. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey. seyfettinciftci@yahoo.com. 3. Department of Urology, Izmit Konak Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey. 4. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsy guidelines recommend that a prostate biopsy not containing glandular prostate tissue should be reported as inadequate. In the literature, there is a lack of any study that addresses the relationship between the length of biopsy cores and the absence of glandular prostate tissue. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a relationship exists between these parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1,712 consecutive initial transrectal 12-core prostate biopsies. Individual cores were histologically categorized as glandular (benign or malignant) and non-glandular (rectal mucosa, periprostatic adipose tissue, prostatic or periprostatic fibromuscular tissue). Total number of evaluable cores ≤9, highly fragmented, incorrectly numbered or dried biopsies, patients with 5-α reductase inhibitory treatment were excluded. RESULTS: We analyzed remaining 1,584 patients; 41.7 % had adenocarcinoma. A total of 19,144 cores were sampled. Non-glandular cores were found significantly shorter than glandular cores (p < 0.0001). The percentages of non-glandular cores were significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral biopsy sites (p < 0.0001). We found a 6-mm cutoff value for accurate prediction of glandular sampling with 80.2 % sensitivity and 78.7 % specificity. The risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold in cores ≤6 mm (OR 14.91, 95% CI 13.20-16.83, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Non-glandular sampling was directly associated with shorter core lengths. They were found significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral localizations. We found a 6-mm cutoff value for the prediction of non-glandular samples before the histologic evaluation. Below this value, the risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold. We suggest it for prompt additional sampling during biopsy procedure.
INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsy guidelines recommend that a prostate biopsy not containing glandular prostate tissue should be reported as inadequate. In the literature, there is a lack of any study that addresses the relationship between the length of biopsy cores and the absence of glandular prostate tissue. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a relationship exists between these parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1,712 consecutive initial transrectal 12-core prostate biopsies. Individual cores were histologically categorized as glandular (benign or malignant) and non-glandular (rectal mucosa, periprostatic adipose tissue, prostatic or periprostatic fibromuscular tissue). Total number of evaluable cores ≤9, highly fragmented, incorrectly numbered or dried biopsies, patients with 5-α reductase inhibitory treatment were excluded. RESULTS: We analyzed remaining 1,584 patients; 41.7 % had adenocarcinoma. A total of 19,144 cores were sampled. Non-glandular cores were found significantly shorter than glandular cores (p < 0.0001). The percentages of non-glandular cores were significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral biopsy sites (p < 0.0001). We found a 6-mm cutoff value for accurate prediction of glandular sampling with 80.2 % sensitivity and 78.7 % specificity. The risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold in cores ≤6 mm (OR 14.91, 95% CI 13.20-16.83, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Non-glandular sampling was directly associated with shorter core lengths. They were found significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral localizations. We found a 6-mm cutoff value for the prediction of non-glandular samples before the histologic evaluation. Below this value, the risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold. We suggest it for prompt additional sampling during biopsy procedure.
Entities:
Keywords:
Core length; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer
Authors: Kenneth A Iczkowski; George Casella; R John Seppala; Galin L Jones; Barbara A Mishler; Junqi Qian; David G Bostwick Journal: Urology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Th H van der Kwast; C Lopes; C Santonja; C-G Pihl; I Neetens; P Martikainen; S Di Lollo; L Bubendorf; R F Hoedemaeker Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Leonardo O Reis; Brunno C F Sanches; Gustavo Borges de Mendonça; Daniel M Silva; Tiago Aguiar; Ocivaldo P Menezes; Athanase Billis Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Alessandro Bertaccini; Andrea Fandella; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Vincenzo Ficarra; Carlo Trombetta; Massimo Gion; Giuseppe Martorana Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Hasan Yılmaz; Ufuk Yavuz; Murat Üstüner; Seyfettin Çiftçi; Hikmet Yaşar; Bahar Müezzinoğlu; Ali Kemal Uslubaş; Özdal Dillioğlugil Journal: Turk J Urol Date: 2017-07-31