Literature DB >> 25777278

Minimum 6 mm core length is strongly predictive for the presence of glandular tissue in transrectal prostate biopsy.

Hasan Yilmaz1, Seyfettin Ciftci2, Murat Ustuner1, Ufuk Yavuz1, Ali Saribacak3, Bahar Muezzinoglu4, Ozdal Dillioglugil1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsy guidelines recommend that a prostate biopsy not containing glandular prostate tissue should be reported as inadequate. In the literature, there is a lack of any study that addresses the relationship between the length of biopsy cores and the absence of glandular prostate tissue. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a relationship exists between these parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1,712 consecutive initial transrectal 12-core prostate biopsies. Individual cores were histologically categorized as glandular (benign or malignant) and non-glandular (rectal mucosa, periprostatic adipose tissue, prostatic or periprostatic fibromuscular tissue). Total number of evaluable cores ≤9, highly fragmented, incorrectly numbered or dried biopsies, patients with 5-α reductase inhibitory treatment were excluded.
RESULTS: We analyzed remaining 1,584 patients; 41.7 % had adenocarcinoma. A total of 19,144 cores were sampled. Non-glandular cores were found significantly shorter than glandular cores (p < 0.0001). The percentages of non-glandular cores were significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral biopsy sites (p < 0.0001). We found a 6-mm cutoff value for accurate prediction of glandular sampling with 80.2 % sensitivity and 78.7 % specificity. The risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold in cores ≤6 mm (OR 14.91, 95% CI 13.20-16.83, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-glandular sampling was directly associated with shorter core lengths. They were found significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral localizations. We found a 6-mm cutoff value for the prediction of non-glandular samples before the histologic evaluation. Below this value, the risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold. We suggest it for prompt additional sampling during biopsy procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core length; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25777278     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1536-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

1.  Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters.

Authors:  Can Öbek; Tünkut Doğanca; Sinan Erdal; Sarper Erdoğan; Haydar Durak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  What is the adequacy of biopsies for prostate sampling?

Authors:  Hasan Serkan Dogan; Berna Aytac; Yakup Kordan; Feyzullah Gasanov; İsmet Yavascaoglu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection.

Authors:  Marcus D Ruopp; Neil J Perkins; Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; George Casella; R John Seppala; Galin L Jones; Barbara A Mishler; Junqi Qian; David G Bostwick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies.

Authors:  Th H van der Kwast; C Lopes; C Santonja; C-G Pihl; I Neetens; P Martikainen; S Di Lollo; L Bubendorf; R F Hoedemaeker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Gleason underestimation is predicted by prostate biopsy core length.

Authors:  Leonardo O Reis; Brunno C F Sanches; Gustavo Borges de Mendonça; Daniel M Silva; Tiago Aguiar; Ocivaldo P Menezes; Athanase Billis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Saadettin Yilmaz Eskicorapci; Dilek Ertoy Baydar; Cem Akbal; Mustafa Sofikerim; Mert Günay; Sinan Ekici; Haluk Ozen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Systematic development of clinical practice guidelines for prostate biopsies: a 3-year Italian project.

Authors:  Alessandro Bertaccini; Andrea Fandella; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Vincenzo Ficarra; Carlo Trombetta; Massimo Gion; Giuseppe Martorana
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

View more
  1 in total

1.  Longer biopsy cores do not increase prostate cancer detection rate: A large-scale cohort study refuting cut-off values indicated in the literature.

Authors:  Hasan Yılmaz; Ufuk Yavuz; Murat Üstüner; Seyfettin Çiftçi; Hikmet Yaşar; Bahar Müezzinoğlu; Ali Kemal Uslubaş; Özdal Dillioğlugil
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-07-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.