Literature DB >> 28861301

Longer biopsy cores do not increase prostate cancer detection rate: A large-scale cohort study refuting cut-off values indicated in the literature.

Hasan Yılmaz1, Ufuk Yavuz2, Murat Üstüner3, Seyfettin Çiftçi4, Hikmet Yaşar5, Bahar Müezzinoğlu6, Ali Kemal Uslubaş1, Özdal Dillioğlugil1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Only a few papers in the literature aimed to evaluate biopsy core lengths. Additionally, studies evaluated the core length with different approaches. We aimed to determine whether prostate cancer (PCa) detection is affected from core lengths according to three different approaches in a large standard cohort and compare our cut-off values with the published cut-offs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,523 initial consecutive transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsies. Biopsies were evaluated with respect to total core length (total length of each patients' core) average core length (total core length divided by total number of cores in each patient), and mean core length (mean length of all cores pooled), and compared our cut-off values with the published cut-offs. The prostate volumes were categorized into four groups (<30, 30-59.99, 60-119.99, ≥120 cm3) and PCa detection rates in these categories were examined.
RESULTS: PCa was found in 41.5% patients. There was no difference between benign and malignant mean core lengths of the pooled cores (p>0.05). Total core length and average core length were not significantly associated with PCa in multivariate logistic regression analyses (p>0.05). The core lengths (mean, average and total core lengths) increased (p<0.001) and PCa rates decreased (p<0.001) steadily with increasing prostate volume categories. PCa percentages decreased in all categories above the utilized cut-offs for mean (p>0.05), average (p<0.05), and total core lengths (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: There was no difference between mean core lengths of benign and malignant cores. Total core length and average core length were not significantly associated with PCa. Contrary to the cut-offs used for mean and average core lengths in the published studies, PCa rates decrease as these core lengths increase. Larger studies are necessary for the determination and acceptance of accurate cut-offs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core length; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; prostate volume; transrectal ultrasound

Year:  2017        PMID: 28861301      PMCID: PMC5562248          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.03743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  19 in total

1.  Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters.

Authors:  Can Öbek; Tünkut Doğanca; Sinan Erdal; Sarper Erdoğan; Haydar Durak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume.

Authors:  P I Karakiewicz; M Bazinet; A G Aprikian; C Trudel; S Aronson; M Nachabé; F Péloquint; J Dessureault; M S Goyal; L R Bégin; M M Elhilali
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Minimum 6 mm core length is strongly predictive for the presence of glandular tissue in transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hasan Yilmaz; Seyfettin Ciftci; Murat Ustuner; Ufuk Yavuz; Ali Saribacak; Bahar Muezzinoglu; Ozdal Dillioglugil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume.

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Yan Kit Fong; Michael Dobrovits; Theodore Anagnostou; Christian Seitz; Matthias Waldert; Mike Harik; Sybille Marihart; Michael Marberger; Bob Djavan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prostate cancer detection: relationship to prostate size.

Authors:  M E Chen; P Troncoso; D Johnston; K Tang; R J Babaian
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; George Casella; R John Seppala; Galin L Jones; Barbara A Mishler; Junqi Qian; David G Bostwick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Prospective evaluation of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Nathalie Nicolaiew; Charles Marchand; Stéphane Terry; Francis Vacherot; Dimitri Vordos; Yves Allory; Claude-Clément Abbou; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Systematic development of clinical practice guidelines for prostate biopsies: a 3-year Italian project.

Authors:  Alessandro Bertaccini; Andrea Fandella; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Vincenzo Ficarra; Carlo Trombetta; Massimo Gion; Giuseppe Martorana
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Clinical value of core length in contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Il Hwang; Sung Kyu Hong; Hak Jong Lee; Seok Soo Byun; Gheeyoung Choe; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Do longer or shorter cores yield more cancer?

Authors:  Yılmaz Hasan; Dillioğlugil Özdal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.