Literature DB >> 27635285

Does length of prostate biopsy cores have an impact on diagnosis of prostate cancer?

Müslüm Ergün1, Ekrem İslamoğlu1, Soner Yalçınkaya1, Hüsnü Tokgöz1, Murat Savaş1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether core length is a significant biopsy parameter in the detection of prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed pathology reports of the specimens of 188 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who had undergone initial transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy, and compared biopsy core lengths of the patients with, and without prostate cancer. The biopsy specimens of prostate cancer patients were divided into 3 groups according to core length, and the data obtained were compared (Group 1; total core length <10 mm, Group 2; total core length 10 mm-19 mm, and Group 3; total core length >20 mm). Biopsy core lengths of the patients diagnosed as prostate cancer, and benign prostatic hyperplasia were compared, and a certain cut-off value for core length with optimal diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer was calculated.
RESULTS: Mean age, PSA and total length of cores were 65.08±7.41 years, 9.82±6.34 ng/mL and 11.2±0.2 mm, respectively. Assessment of biopsy core lengths showed that cores with cancer (n=993, median length 12.5 mm) were significantly longer than benign cores (n=1185, median length=11.3 mm) (p<0.001). Core length analysis yielded 12 mm cores have an optimal sensitivity (41.9%) and specificity (62%) for detection of cancer (odds ratio: 1.08).
CONCLUSION: Biopsy core length is one of the most important parameter that determines the quality of biopsy and detection of prostate cancer. A median sample length of 12 mm is ideal lower limit for cancer detection, and biopsy procedures which yield shorter biopsy cores should be repeated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; cancer; core length; prostate

Year:  2016        PMID: 27635285      PMCID: PMC5012437          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.78700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  13 in total

1.  Optimized preembedding method improves the histologic yield of prostatic core needle biopsies.

Authors:  H Rogatsch; T Mairinger; W Horninger; A Gschwendtner; G Bartsch; G Mikuz
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters.

Authors:  Can Öbek; Tünkut Doğanca; Sinan Erdal; Sarper Erdoğan; Haydar Durak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  What is the adequacy of biopsies for prostate sampling?

Authors:  Hasan Serkan Dogan; Berna Aytac; Yakup Kordan; Feyzullah Gasanov; İsmet Yavascaoglu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; George Casella; R John Seppala; Galin L Jones; Barbara A Mishler; Junqi Qian; David G Bostwick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaus Eichler; Susanne Hempel; Jennifer Wilby; Lindsey Myers; Lucas M Bachmann; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Guido Martignoni; Giovanni Novella; Maria Angela Cerruto; Antonio Galfano; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Pea; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?

Authors:  B Djavan; V Ravery; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; M Dobrovits; M Fakhari; C Seitz; M Susani; A Borkowski; L Boccon-Gibod; C C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies.

Authors:  Th H van der Kwast; C Lopes; C Santonja; C-G Pihl; I Neetens; P Martikainen; S Di Lollo; L Bubendorf; R F Hoedemaeker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Needle biopsies of the prostate: what constitutes adequate histologic sampling?

Authors:  R B Lane; C G Lane; K A Mangold; M H Johnson; W C Allsbrook
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.