Literature DB >> 12719451

Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies.

Th H van der Kwast1, C Lopes, C Santonja, C-G Pihl, I Neetens, P Martikainen, S Di Lollo, L Bubendorf, R F Hoedemaeker.   

Abstract

The reported detection rate of prostate cancer, lesions suspicious for cancer, and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in needle biopsies is highly variable. In part, technical factors, including the quality of the biopsies, the tissue processing, and histopathological reporting, may account for these differences. It has been thought that standardisation of tissue processing might reduce the observed variations in detection rate. Consensus among the members of the pathology committee of the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) concerning the optimal methodology of tissue embedding resulting in guidelines for prostatic needle biopsy processing was reached. The adoption of an unequivocal and uniform way of reporting lesions encountered in prostatic needle biopsies is considered helpful for decision taking by the clinician. The definition of parameters for quality control of prostatic needle biopsy diagnostics will further facilitate clinical epidemiological multicentre studies of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12719451      PMCID: PMC1769959          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.56.5.336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  25 in total

1.  Optimized preembedding method improves the histologic yield of prostatic core needle biopsies.

Authors:  H Rogatsch; T Mairinger; W Horninger; A Gschwendtner; G Bartsch; G Mikuz
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  How should atypical prostate needle biopsies be reported? Controversies regarding the term "ASAP".

Authors:  J I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  ASAP is a valid diagnosis. Atypical small acinar proliferation.

Authors:  K A Iczkowski; L Cheng; J Qian; J Shanks; V Gadaleanu; D G Bostwick; D M Ramnani
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Diagnostic effect of complete histologic sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens.

Authors:  A O Reyes; P A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Relationship and significance of greatest percentage of tumor and perineural invasion on needle biopsy in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M A Rubin; N Bassily; M Sanda; J Montie; M S Strawderman; K Wojno
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: morphologic criteria for its distinction from well-differentiated carcinoma.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; J Srigley; D Grignon; J Maksem; P Humphrey; T H van der Kwast; D Bose; J Harrison; R H Young
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  Prospective origins of prostate carcinoma. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia.

Authors:  D G Bostwick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Granulomatous prostatitis on needle biopsy.

Authors:  J R Oppenheimer; H Kahane; J I Epstein
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Diagnosis of "suspicious for malignancy" in prostate biopsies: predictive value for cancer.

Authors:  K A Iczkowski; T J Bassler; V S Schwob; I C Bassler; B S Kunnel; R E Orozco; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  The results of a five-year early prostate cancer detection intervention. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.

Authors:  C Mettlin; G P Murphy; R J Babaian; A Chesley; R A Kane; P J Littrup; F K Mostofi; P S Ray; A M Shanberg; A Toi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  17 in total

1.  Minimum 6 mm core length is strongly predictive for the presence of glandular tissue in transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hasan Yilmaz; Seyfettin Ciftci; Murat Ustuner; Ufuk Yavuz; Ali Saribacak; Bahar Muezzinoglu; Ozdal Dillioglugil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Association of training level and outcome of software-based image fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Niklas Westhoff; Henning Haumann; Maximilian Christian Kriegmair; Jost von Hardenberg; Johannes Budjan; Stefan Porubsky; Maurice Stephan Michel; Patrick Honeck; Manuel Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rutger J Dost; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Anthonius J Breeuwsma; Igle J de Jong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  [Prostate biopsy. Update for indication, procedure, and future developments].

Authors:  S Machtens; A Roosen; C G Stief; M C Truß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Does length of prostate biopsy cores have an impact on diagnosis of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Müslüm Ergün; Ekrem İslamoğlu; Soner Yalçınkaya; Hüsnü Tokgöz; Murat Savaş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

6.  Handling and reporting of transperineal template prostate biopsy in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP).

Authors:  Solene-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Eva Compérat; Lars Egevad; Ondra Hes; Jon Oxley; Murali Varma; Glen Kristiansen; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  [Trends in prostate biopsy interpretation].

Authors:  J Köllermann; G Sauter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  [Active surveillance of localized prostate cancer. Significance of prostate core needle biopsies].

Authors:  J Rüschoff; P Middel; P Albers
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.