Literature DB >> 11991643

Transcript abundance supercedes editing efficiency as a factor in developmental variation of chloroplast gene expression.

Nemo M Peeters1, Maureen R Hanson.   

Abstract

In maize plastids, transcripts are known to be modified at 27 C-to-U RNA editing sites, affecting the expression-of 15 different genes. The relative contribution of editing efficiency versus transcript abundance in regulation of chloroplast gene expression has previously been analyzed for only a few genes. We undertook a comprehensive analysis of the editing efficiency of each of the 27 maize editing sites in 10 different maize tissues, which contain a range of plastid types including chloroplasts, etioplasts, and amyloplasts. Using a reproducible poisoned primer extension assay, we detected variation between RNA editing extent of different sites in the same transcript in the same tissue, and between the same site in different tissues. The most striking editing deficiency is in an editing site in ndhB that is edited at only 8% and 1% in roots and callus plastids respectively, whereas green leaf chloroplasts edit this site at 100%. Editing efficiencies of some sites are not affected by the developmental stages we examined and are always edited close to 80-100%. The relative amounts of transcripts of each of the 10 genes that exhibited variable editing extents were determined by real-time PCR. Seven genes exhibited over 100 times lower transcript abundance in either roots or tissue-cultured cells relative to green leaf tissue. The quantitative analysis indicates that a particular editing site can be efficiently edited over a large range of transcript abundance, resulting in no general correlation of transcript abundance and editing extent. The independent variation of editing efficiency of different sites within the same transcript fits with a model that postulates individual trans-acting factors specific to each editing site. Because tissues where editing efficiency at certain sites is low invariably also exhibited greatly decreased abundance of the transcripts carrying those sites, decrease in the amounts of particular RNAs rather than a lack of editing is predicted to have the most significant impact on gene expression under steady-state conditions. Our data is consistent with the hypothesis that the role of editing in angiosperm plastids is to correct otherwise detrimental mutations rather than to generate significant protein diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11991643      PMCID: PMC1370271          DOI: 10.1017/s1355838202029424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  46 in total

1.  Conservation of RNA editing between rice and maize plastids: are most editing events dispensable?

Authors:  S Corneille; K Lutz; P Maliga
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  2000-11

2.  Unequal expression of allelic kainate receptor GluR7 mRNAs in human brains.

Authors:  H H Schiffer; G T Swanson; E Masliah; S F Heinemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Expression and post-transcriptional regulation of maize transposable element MuDR and its derivatives.

Authors:  G N Rudenko; V Walbot
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  A single alteration 20 nt 5' to an editing target inhibits chloroplast RNA editing in vivo.

Authors:  M L Reed; N M Peeters; M R Hanson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  A quantitative method to detect RNA editing events.

Authors:  H H Schiffer; S F Heinemann
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  The late developmental pattern of Mu transposon excision is conferred by a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S -driven MURA cDNA in transgenic maize.

Authors:  M N Raizada; V Walbot
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Transcripts of the ndhH-D operon of barley plastids: possible role of unedited site III in splicing of the ndhA intron.

Authors:  E M del Campo; B Sabater; M Martín
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Sense from nonsense: how the genetic information of chloroplasts is altered by RNA editing.

Authors:  R Bock
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.079

9.  RNA editing in Arabidopsis mitochondria effects 441 C to U changes in ORFs.

Authors:  P Giegé; A Brennicke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Identification of the Ndh (NAD(P)H-plastoquinone-oxidoreductase) complex in etioplast membranes of barley: changes during photomorphogenesis of chloroplasts.

Authors:  A Guéra; P G de Nova; B Sabater
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.927

View more
  37 in total

1.  Developmental co-variation of RNA editing extent of plastid editing sites exhibiting similar cis-elements.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Chateigner-Boutin; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Cross-competition in transgenic chloroplasts expressing single editing sites reveals shared cis elements.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Chateigner-Boutin; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  RNA editing in ribosome-less plastids of iojap maize.

Authors:  Christine P Halter; Nemo M Peeters; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Identification of a sequence motif critical for editing of a tobacco chloroplast transcript.

Authors:  Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.942

5.  An accurate fluorescent assay for quantifying the extent of RNA editing.

Authors:  Loretta M Roberson; Joshua J C Rosenthal
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Expression of plastid genes: organelle-specific elaborations on a prokaryotic scaffold.

Authors:  Alice Barkan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Differential regulation of Arabidopsis plastid gene expression and RNA editing in non-photosynthetic tissues.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Tseng; Chih-Jen Lee; Yi-Ting Chung; Tzu-Ying Sung; Ming-Hsiun Hsieh
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  RNA Recognition Motif-Containing Protein ORRM4 Broadly Affects Mitochondrial RNA Editing and Impacts Plant Development and Flowering.

Authors:  Xiaowen Shi; Arnaud Germain; Maureen R Hanson; Stéphane Bentolila
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Plastid mRNAs are neither spliced nor edited in maize and cauliflower mitochondrial in organello systems.

Authors:  Nina Bolle; Inga Hinrichsen; Frank Kempken
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression.

Authors:  Eva M del Campo
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2009-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.