Literature DB >> 11266552

A single alteration 20 nt 5' to an editing target inhibits chloroplast RNA editing in vivo.

M L Reed1, N M Peeters, M R Hanson.   

Abstract

Transcripts of typical dicot plant plastid genes undergo C-->U RNA editing at approximately 30 locations, but there is no consensus sequence surrounding the C targets of editing. The cis-acting elements required for editing of the C located at tobacco rpoB editing site II were investigated by introducing translatable chimeric minigenes containing sequence -20 to +6 surrounding the C target of editing. When the -20 to +6 sequence specified by the homologous region present in the black pine chloroplast genome was incorporated, virtually no editing of the transcripts occurred in transgenic tobacco plastids. Nucleotides that differ between the black pine and tobacco sequence were tested for their role in C-->U editing by designing chimeric genes containing one or more of these divergent nucleotides. Surprisingly, the divergent nucleotide that had the strongest negative effect on editing of the minigene transcript was located -20 nt 5' to the C target of editing. Expression of transgene transcripts carrying the 27 nt sequence did not affect the editing extent of the endogenous rpoB transcripts, even though the chimeric transcripts were much more abundant than those of the endogenous gene. In plants carrying a 93 nt rpoB editing site sequence, transgene transcripts accumulated to a level three times greater than transgene transcripts in the plants carrying the 27 nt rpoB editing sites and resulted in editing of the endogenous transcripts from 100 to 50%. Both a lower affinity of the 27 nt site for a trans-acting factor and lower abundance of the transcript could explain why expression of minigene transcripts containing the 27 nt sequence did not affect endogenous editing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11266552      PMCID: PMC31290          DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.7.1507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  16 in total

1.  Transfer of plastid RNA-editing activity to novel sites suggests a critical role for spacing in editing-site recognition.

Authors:  M Hermann; R Bock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Identification of critical nucleotide positions for plastid RNA editing site recognition.

Authors:  R Bock; M Hermann; M Fuchs
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Sequences directing C to U editing of the plastid psbL mRNA are located within a 22 nucleotide segment spanning the editing site.

Authors:  S Chaudhuri; P Maliga
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Creation of a novel protein-coding region at the RNA level in black pine chloroplasts: the pattern of RNA editing in the gymnosperm chloroplast is different from that in angiosperms.

Authors:  T Wakasugi; T Hirose; M Horihata; T Tsudzuki; H Kössel; M Sugiura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A heterologous maize rpoB editing site is recognized by transgenic tobacco chloroplasts.

Authors:  M L Reed; M R Hanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  In vivo dissection of cis-acting determinants for plastid RNA editing.

Authors:  R Bock; M Hermann; H Kössel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  High-frequency plastid transformation in tobacco by selection for a chimeric aadA gene.

Authors:  Z Svab; P Maliga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Complete sequence of the maize chloroplast genome: gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine tuning of genetic information by transcript editing.

Authors:  R M Maier; K Neckermann; G L Igloi; H Kössel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Editing of the chloroplast rpoB transcript is independent of chloroplast translation and shows different patterns in barley and maize.

Authors:  P Zeltz; W R Hess; K Neckermann; T Börner; H Kössel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Site-specific factor involved in the editing of the psbL mRNA in tobacco plastids.

Authors:  S Chaudhuri; H Carrer; P Maliga
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  22 in total

1.  Transcript abundance supercedes editing efficiency as a factor in developmental variation of chloroplast gene expression.

Authors:  Nemo M Peeters; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 2.  Eukaryotic genome evolution: rearrangement and coevolution of compartmentalized genetic information.

Authors:  Reinhold G Herrmann; Rainer M Maier; Christian Schmitz-Linneweber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A site-specific factor interacts directly with its cognate RNA editing site in chloroplast transcripts.

Authors:  Tetsuya Miyamoto; Junichi Obokata; Masahiro Sugiura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cross-competition in transgenic chloroplasts expressing single editing sites reveals shared cis elements.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Chateigner-Boutin; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Recognition of RNA editing sites is directed by unique proteins in chloroplasts: biochemical identification of cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in RNA editing in tobacco and pea chloroplasts.

Authors:  Tetsuya Miyamoto; Junichi Obokata; Masahiro Sugiura
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Complex cis-elements determine an RNA editing site in pea mitochondria.

Authors:  Mizuki Takenaka; Julia Neuwirt; Axel Brennicke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  An in vitro RNA editing system from cauliflower mitochondria: editing site recognition parameters can vary in different plant species.

Authors:  Julia Neuwirt; Mizuki Takenaka; Johannes A van der Merwe; Axel Brennicke
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Cross-competition in editing of chloroplast RNA transcripts in vitro implicates sharing of trans-factors between different C targets.

Authors:  Wade P Heller; Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Maintenance of plastid RNA editing activities independently of their target sites.

Authors:  Michael Tillich; Peter Poltnigg; Sergei Kushnir; Christian Schmitz-Linneweber
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression.

Authors:  Eva M del Campo
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2009-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.