Literature DB >> 11129045

Conservation of RNA editing between rice and maize plastids: are most editing events dispensable?

S Corneille1, K Lutz, P Maliga.   

Abstract

The extent of conservation of RNA editing sites in the plastid genome of rice was determined by comparing the genomic sequence with that of the cDNA. The presence of a T in the cDNA predicted to be a C by the DNA sequence of the plastid genome, indicated C to U editing. In the 11 plastid transcripts of rice a total of 21 editing sites were found. In maize, a closely related grass species, 26 editing sites have been reported in 13 plastid transcripts. Most editing sites are conserved between the two species, although differences in RNA editing were found at eight sites. In seven cases the T was already encoded at the DNA level, eliminating the requirement for RNA editing. In one case (rpoB, codon 206) the RNA sequence was conserved between the two species, but the mRNA is still not edited in rice. It appears that, although evolutionarily conserved, RNA editing is essential only for a few plastid editing sites. Information about RNA editing in rice plastids will facilitate the design of plastid vectors with broad applicability in grass species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129045     DOI: 10.1007/s004380000295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Gen Genet        ISSN: 0026-8925


  47 in total

1.  Transcript abundance supercedes editing efficiency as a factor in developmental variation of chloroplast gene expression.

Authors:  Nemo M Peeters; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Recognition of RNA editing sites is directed by unique proteins in chloroplasts: biochemical identification of cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in RNA editing in tobacco and pea chloroplasts.

Authors:  Tetsuya Miyamoto; Junichi Obokata; Masahiro Sugiura
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Rapid evolution of RNA editing sites in a small non-essential plastid gene.

Authors:  Andreas Fiebig; Sandra Stegemann; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Identification of a sequence motif critical for editing of a tobacco chloroplast transcript.

Authors:  Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.942

5.  Cross-competition in editing of chloroplast RNA transcripts in vitro implicates sharing of trans-factors between different C targets.

Authors:  Wade P Heller; Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  High conservation of a 5' element required for RNA editing of a C target in chloroplast psbE transcripts.

Authors:  Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  RNA editing events in mitochondrial genes by ultra-deep sequencing methods: a comparison of cytoplasmic male sterile, fertile and restored genotypes in cotton.

Authors:  Hideaki Suzuki; Jiwen Yu; Scott A Ness; Mary A O'Connell; Jinfa Zhang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  The PREP suite: predictive RNA editors for plant mitochondrial genes, chloroplast genes and user-defined alignments.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Mower
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  CURE-Chloroplast: a chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing predictor for seed plants.

Authors:  Pufeng Du; Liyan Jia; Yanda Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Loss of matK RNA editing in seed plant chloroplasts.

Authors:  Michael Tillich; Vinh Le Sy; Katrin Schulerowitz; Arndt von Haeseler; Uwe G Maier; Christian Schmitz-Linneweber
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.