Literature DB >> 10030813

High pressures are generated at the tip of laparoscopic graspers.

J A Cartmill1, A J Shakeshaft, W R Walsh, C J Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite its importance the interface between tissue and instrument is poorly understood.
METHODS: A thin film pressure transducer was deployed between the jaws of eight different laparoscopic instruments and a simulated tissue to study the forces generated at the tip of laparoscopic graspers and the effect of a change in angle of tissue tension at the interface between tissue and laparoscopic grasper.
RESULTS: Pressure was concentrated at the tip of the instrument. Localized pressures increased on average from 210 kPa to 650 kPa as the angle of grasp was increased from 0 to 135 degrees. There was a wide variation between instruments with some exhibiting increases in tip pressure of a factor of eight as the angle was increased.
CONCLUSION: High pressures are generated at the tip of laparoscopic graspers. Pressures increase as the angle of incidence of the grasper in relation to the tissue increases. The changes in pressure with change in angle are independent of load and handle pressure.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10030813     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01496.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; H de Visser; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impact of fenestrations and surface profiling on the holding of tissue by parallel occlusion laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  Andrew W Brown; Stuart I Brown; Donald McLean; Zhigang Wang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Omeed Paydar; Anna Tao; Megan LaRocca; Kang Liu; Bradley Genovese; Robert Candler; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Vacuum grasping as a manipulation technique for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  D Vonck; R H M Goossens; D J van Eijk; I H J T de Hingh; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Inter- and intraindividual variabilities of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; M van der Voort; H de Visser; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Suture Breakage Warning System for Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Syed J Askari; Anna Tao; Yen-Yi Juo; Yuan Dai; Jake Pensa; Robert Candler; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Magnetic retraction of bowel by intraluminal injectable cyanoacrylate-based magnetic glue.

Authors:  Zhigang Wang; Andrew Brown; Pascal André; Stuart I Brown; Gordon J Florence; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Toward Mechanochromic Soft Material-Based Visual Feedback for Electronics-Free Surgical Effectors.

Authors:  Goffredo Giordano; Mariacristina Gagliardi; Yu Huan; Marco Carlotti; Andrea Mariani; Arianna Menciassi; Edoardo Sinibaldi; Barbara Mazzolai
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 16.806

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.