Literature DB >> 8846039

Quantitative standardised analysis of advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures.

G P Claus1, W Sjoerdsma, A Jansen, C A Grimbergen.   

Abstract

To support the improvement of advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures, we designed a quantitative analysis method to monitor surgical activities. The emphasis lies on the time spent on these activities and on the instruments controlled by the hands of the surgeon. Our method uses combined video images originating from the laparoscope, an overview CCD camera placed in the operating theatre and, when available, a video colonoscope. After the operation is finished, the images are evaluated by means of a standardised analysis routine based on a spreadsheet program and a set of standard terms (thesaurus), to minimise subjectivity of the analysis. After calculations, the data are presented in tables and graphs, resulting in objective information for research on the operation. Seven advanced laparoscopic procedures, in this case colon resections, have been analysed, and it was demonstrated that the analysis method is capable of describing different laparoscopic procedures using the limited thesaurus. Possible areas of application of the method are the evaluation of time-consuming parts of the operation, of surgical tasks and measurement of the surgeon's learning curve. Other applications are the prediction and measurement of the impact of new instruments and techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8846039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol        ISSN: 0942-6027


  8 in total

1.  Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Analysis of the quality and efficiency in learning laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  K T den Boer; L T de Wit; P H Davids; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy a mature operative technique?

Authors:  G Welty; E Schippers; V Grablowitz; A G Lawong; A Tittel; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Roberto Rimonda; Marco Ettore Allaix; Giuseppe Giraudo; Corrado Garrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Disturbances in the arthroscopic view defined with video analysis.

Authors:  G J M Tuijthof; I N Sierevelt; C N van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effects of experience on force perception threshold in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M Zhou; J Perreault; S D Schwaitzberg; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Surgical process modelling: a review.

Authors:  Florent Lalys; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Contemporary use of ultrasonic versus standard electrosurgical dissection in laparoscopic nephrectomy: Safety, efficacy and cost.

Authors:  Nand Kishore Arvind; Qutubuddin Ali; Onkar Singh; Shilpi Gupta; Surbhi Sahay
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-07-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.