Literature DB >> 11931309

Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.

Oliver Wegner1, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

This study examines the usefulness of the upward chirp stimulus developed by Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1530-1540 (2000)] for retrieving frequency-specific information. The chirp was designed to produce simultaneous displacement maxima along the cochlear partition by compensating for frequency-dependent traveling-time differences. In the first experiment, auditory brainstem responses (ABR) elicited by the click and the broadband chirp were obtained in the presence of high-pass masking noise, with cutoff frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz. Results revealed a larger wave-V amplitude for chirp than for click stimulation in all masking conditions. Wave-V amplitude for the chirp increased continuously with increasing high-pass cutoff frequency while it remains nearly constant for the click for cutoff frequencies greater than 1 kHz. The same two stimuli were tested in the presence of a notched-noise masker with one-octave wide spectral notches corresponding to the cutoff frequencies used in the first experiment. The recordings were compared with derived responses, calculated offline, from the high-pass masking conditions. No significant difference in response amplitude between click and chirp stimulation was found for the notched-noise responses as well as for the derived responses. In the second experiment, responses were obtained using narrow-band stimuli. A low-frequency chirp and a 250-Hz tone pulse with comparable duration and magnitude spectrum were used as stimuli. The narrow-band chirp elicited a larger response amplitude than the tone pulse at low and medium stimulation levels. Overall, the results of the present study further demonstrate the importance of considering peripheral processing for the formation of ABR. The chirp might be of particular interest for assessing low-frequency information.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931309     DOI: 10.1121/1.1433805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Sinnet G B Kristensen; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The biophysical origin of traveling-wave dispersion in the cochlea.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Ding-Jun Zha; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; A Neumann; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  [Objective frequency-specific measurement of hearing threshold using narrow-band chirp stimuli with level-adaptive simultaneous masking].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Click- and chirp-evoked human compound action potentials.

Authors:  Mark Chertoff; Jeffery Lichtenhan; Marie Willis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Assessing Cochlear-Place Specific Temporal Coding Using Multi-Band Complex Tones to Measure Envelope-Following Responses.

Authors:  Le Wang; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Input and output compensation for the cochlear traveling wave delay in wide-band ABR recordings: implications for small acoustic tumor detection.

Authors:  Manuel Don; Claus Elberling; Erin Maloff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  The influence of cochlear spectral processing on the timing and amplitude of the speech-evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Helen E Nuttall; David R Moore; Johanna G Barry; Katrin Krumbholz; Jessica de Boer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.