Literature DB >> 16283133

[Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].

R Schönweiler1, A Neumann, M Ptok.   

Abstract

Auditory evoked responses to tone-pips in notched-noise provide frequency specific estimations of thresholds. Most often, test frequencies are 0.5-4 kHz. Thresholds are expected to match with a high degree to behavioral thresholds. However, only few studies are available containing data on stimulus and averaging parameters, especially at a test frequency of 0.25 kHz. In order to find "optimal" parameters for a widely used device (Nicolet Spirit Version 1.6), we designed five experiments on stimulus polarity (Exp.I), sweep frequency (Exp.II), stimulus duration (Exp.III), notched noise level (Exp.IV), and threshold estimation (Exp.V). The experiments also included a low test frequency of 0.25 kHz. These experiments were applied to 29 healthy volunteers (n=29, aged 20-41 years with normal hearing and no history of illness of the ear). We found that alternating stimulus polarity and a sweep frequency of 43.5/s evoked responses that were highest with respect to amplitudes (0.2-0.4 mV) and correlations (0.49-0.91). A novel finding of the study was that the highest amplitudes and correlations could be achieved if stimulus durations and notched-noise-levels were specifically adjusted to the test frequencies (stimulus durations 0.25 kHz: 4 ms, 0.5 Hz: 2 ms, 1-4 kHz: 1 ms, notched-noise-levels 0.25-0.5 Hz: +10 dB, 1-4 kHz: +/-0 dB). Deviations from behavioral thresholds did not exceed +/-5 dB in 93% of the measures. The results indicate that frequency specific auditory evoked responses provide reliable threshold estimations. Future experiments are required to confirm the threshold deviations for hard of hearing individuals.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283133     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1187-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  37 in total

1.  Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  D R Stapells; T W Picton; A Durieux-Smith; C G Edwards; L M Moran
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1990

Review 2.  The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements.

Authors:  M P Gorga; A R Thornton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.

Authors:  S C Purdy; J M Houghton; W J Keith; K A Greville
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1989

4.  The normative basis for click and frequency-specific BERA in high-risk infants.

Authors:  M L Hyde; N Matsumoto; P W Alberti
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Frequency-specific BERA in infants.

Authors:  M L Hyde
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1985-02

6.  Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise.

Authors:  T W Picton; J Ouellette; G Hamel; A D Smith
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1979-08

7.  Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Y S Sininger; C Abdala; B Cone-Wesson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  [Results of recording frequency-specific acoustically evoked potentials with masked stimuli].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; R Tolloczko; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  D R Stapells; J S Gravel; B A Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants.

Authors:  D R Stapells; R Galambos; J A Costello; S Makeig
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug
View more
  3 in total

1.  [On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Steady-state responses of the auditory system: a comparison of different methods].

Authors:  S Liebler; S Hoth; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Hearing impairment and language delay in infants: Diagnostics and genetics.

Authors:  Ruth Lang-Roth
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.