Literature DB >> 11924839

Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair.

Angela D Friederici1, Anja Hahne, Douglas Saddy.   

Abstract

Aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair were investigated by comparing the event-related (brain) potentials (ERPs) for sentences of different syntactic complexity to those containing a syntactic violation. Previous research had shown that both aspects of syntactic processing are reflected in a late positivity (P600). Results from the present reading experiment demonstrate, however, that although both processing aspects elicit a late positivity, they are different in distribution. The repair-related positivity preceded by a negativity displayed a centroparietal distribution, whereas the complexity-related positivity showed a frontocentral scalp distribution. These data indicate that the P600 is not a unitary phenomenon. Moreover, the distributional differences strongly suggest that different neural structures underlie the two aspects of processing, namely syntactic repair and syntactic integration difficulties, most evident when processing syntactically complex sentences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11924839     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014376204525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  22 in total

1.  What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Hahne; J D Jescheniak
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-04

2.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  A D Friederici; A Mecklinger; K M Spencer; K Steinhauer; E Donchin
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-04

3.  Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing.

Authors:  T C Gunter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words.

Authors:  T F Münte; M Matzke; S Johannes
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.

Authors:  T F Münte; H J Heinze; M Matzke; B M Wieringa; S Johannes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.

Authors:  A D Friederici; K Steinhauer; A Mecklinger; M Meyer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities.

Authors:  J M Hopf; J Bayer; M Bader; M Meng
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.

Authors:  A Mecklinger; H Schriefers; K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

9.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.

Authors:  L Osterhout; P J Holcomb; D A Swinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  48 in total

1.  Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: an ERP study.

Authors:  Edith Kaan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-03

2.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Edward W Wlotko; Esmeralda De Ochoa-Dewald; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.

Authors:  Jörg Bahlmann; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Michael Rotte; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.

Authors:  Michelle Leckey; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English.

Authors:  Sonja A Kotz; Phillip J Holcomb; Lee Osterhout
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-12-03

6.  Structural priming among prepositional phrases: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

7.  Native and Non-native Speakers' Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps.

Authors:  Anna Jessen; Julia Festman; Oliver Boxell; Claudia Felser
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

8.  The effects of attention and task-relevance on the processing of syntactic violations during listening to two concurrent speech streams.

Authors:  Orsolya Szalárdy; Brigitta Tóth; Dávid Farkas; Annamária Kovács; Gábor Urbán; Gábor Orosz; Beáta Tünde Szabó; László Hunyadi; Botond Hajdu; István Winkler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Native-language N400 and P600 predict dissociable language-learning abilities in adults.

Authors:  Zhenghan Qi; Sara D Beach; Amy S Finn; Jennifer Minas; Calvin Goetz; Brian Chan; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Influence of Second Language Proficiency and Syntactic Structure Similarities on the Sensitivity and Processing of English Passive Sentence in Late Chinese-English Bilinguists: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Xin Chang; Pei Wang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.