Literature DB >> 17274018

An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.

Jörg Bahlmann1, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells, Michael Rotte, Thomas F Münte.   

Abstract

Understanding a complex sentence requires the processing of information at different (e.g., phonological, semantic, and syntactic) levels, the intermediate storage of this information and the unification of this information to compute the meaning of the sentence information. The present investigation homed in on two aspects of sentence processing: working memory and reanalysis. Event-related functional MRI was used in 12 healthy native speakers of German, while they read sentences. Half of the sentences had unambiguous initial noun-phrases (masculine nominative, masculine accusative) and thus signaled subject-first (canonical) or object-first (noncanonical) sentences. Noncanonical unambiguous sentences were supposed to entail greater demand on working memory, because of their more complex syntactic structure. The other half of the sentences had case-ambiguous initial noun-phrases (feminine gender). Only the second unambiguous noun-phrase (eighth position in the sentences) revealed, whether a canonical or noncanonical word order was present. Based on previous data it was hypothesized that ambiguous noncanonical sentences required a recomputation of the sentence, as subjects would initially commit to a subject first reading. In the respective contrasts two main areas of brain activation were observed. Unambiguous noncanonical sentences elicited more activation in left inferior frontal cortex relative unambiguous canonical sentences. This was interpreted in conjunction with the greater demands on working memory in the former condition. For noncanonical ambiguous relative to canonical ambiguous sentences, an activation of the left supramarginal gyrus was revealed, which was interpreted as a reflection of the reanalysis-requirements induced by this condition. Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17274018      PMCID: PMC6871458          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  41 in total

1.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  A D Friederici; A Mecklinger; K M Spencer; K Steinhauer; E Donchin
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-04

2.  The costs of freedom: an ERP -- study of non-canonical sentences.

Authors:  Mike Matzke; Heinke Mai; Wido Nager; Jascha Rüsseler; Thomas Münte
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.

Authors:  Christian J Fiebach; Sandra H Vos; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Event-related brain potential studies in language.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

Authors:  J W King; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

Review 8.  The neural correlates of consciousness: an analysis of cognitive skill learning.

Authors:  M E Raichle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K Stromswold; D Caplan; N Alpert; S Rauch
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.

Authors:  A D Friederici; K Steinhauer; A Mecklinger; M Meyer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  12 in total

1.  Neural correlates of syntactic processing in the nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Nina F Dronkers; Jennifer M Ogar; Jung Jang; Matthew E Growdon; Federica Agosta; Maya L Henry; Bruce L Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski; Eduardo Europa; David Caplan; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Syntactic computation in the human brain: the degree of merger as a key factor.

Authors:  Shinri Ohta; Naoki Fukui; Kuniyoshi L Sakai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neural mechanisms of anaphoric reference revealed by FMRI.

Authors:  Anke Hammer; Bernadette M Jansma; Claus Tempelmann; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-24

7.  Maturation of the language network: from inter- to intrahemispheric connectivities.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Jens Brauer; Gabriele Lohmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Left inferior frontal activations depending on the canonicity determined by the argument structures of ditransitive sentences: an MEG study.

Authors:  Tomoo Inubushi; Kazuki Iijima; Masatoshi Koizumi; Kuniyoshi L Sakai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development of a selective left-hemispheric fronto-temporal network for processing syntactic complexity in language comprehension.

Authors:  Yaqiong Xiao; Angela D Friederici; Daniel S Margulies; Jens Brauer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Preschoolers' brains rely on semantic cues prior to the mastery of syntax during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Chiao-Yi Wu; Kodjo Vissiennon; Angela D Friederici; Jens Brauer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.