Literature DB >> 12022794

Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: an ERP study.

Edith Kaan1.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate whether the processing of subject-verb dependencies is influenced by (1) the linear distance between the subject and the verb and (2) the presence of an intervening noun phrase with interfering number features. Linear distance did not affect integration and diagnosis or revision processes at the verb, as indexed by early negative and P600 components. This is in accordance with hierarchy-based models of reanalysis, but is problematic for distance-based integration models. However, tracking of the subject features is affected by linear factors: more judgment errors were made in the long compared to the short condition. Furthermore, the presence of a plural object between the singular subject and the verb led to more judgment errors, and an enhanced positivity around 250 ms for the grammatical verbs. This suggests that linear factors affect feature tracking, but not integration processes following feature retrieval or repair processes following the detection of a mismatch.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022794     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014978917769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  30 in total

1.  Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures.

Authors:  B McElree
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing.

Authors:  T C Gunter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  P Hagoort; C M Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  Broken agreement.

Authors:  K Bock; C A Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words.

Authors:  T F Münte; M Matzke; S Johannes
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear?

Authors:  G Vigliocco; J Nicol
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

Review 8.  The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.

Authors:  A Mecklinger; H Schriefers; K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  22 in total

1.  The effects of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise.

Authors:  Rebecca Carroll; Esther Ruigendijk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

2.  Late L2ers can acquire grammatical features that do not occur in their L1: Evidence from the effect of animacy on verb agreement in L1 Chinese.

Authors:  Henrietta Lempert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  Subject-verb agreement in children and adults: serial or hierarchical processing?

Authors:  Isabelle Negro; Lucile Chanquoy; Michel Fayol; Maryse Louis-Sidney
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-05

4.  Neurophysiology of Hungarian subject-verb dependencies with varying intervening complexity.

Authors:  Hajnal Jolsvai; Elyse Sussman; Roland Csuhaj; Valéria Csépe
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Janet Nicol; Laurel Brehm
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition.

Authors:  Nils Skotara; Monique Kügow; Uta Salden; Barbara Hänel-Faulhaber; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Effects of negative content on the processing of gender information: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  José A Hinojosa; Jacobo Albert; Uxía Fernández-Folgueiras; Gerardo Santaniello; Cristina López-Bachiller; Manuel Sebastián; Alberto J Sánchez-Carmona; Miguel A Pozo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Time-driven effects on processing grammatical agreement.

Authors:  Mikael Roll; Sabine Gosselke; Magnus Lindgren; Merle Horne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-30

9.  Electrophysiology of subject-verb agreement mediated by speakers' gender.

Authors:  Adriana Hanulíková; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  'Right Now, Sophie (∗)Swims in the Pool?!': Brain Potentials of Grammatical Aspect Processing.

Authors:  Monique Flecken; Kelly Walbert; Ton Dijkstra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.