Literature DB >> 10098388

Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing.

T C Gunter1, A D Friederici.   

Abstract

In a within-subjects design, event-related potentials were compared for two types of sentence-final syntactic errors: Incorrect verb inflection and incorrect word category (phrase structure). In a grammatical judgment task, these errors triggered robust N400 and P600 components. To assess the degree of automaticity of the underlying linguistic processes, the N400 and P600 effects were measured in a task for which the participants judged whether a word in a sentence was printed in upper case. In this physical judgment task, the N400 and P600 following verb inflection errors were greatly attenuated or absent, whereas those elicited by word category violation were only slightly diminished in amplitude. The data suggest that word category information is processed more automatically than inflectional information. The P600 appears to reflect a relatively controlled language-related process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10098388     DOI: 10.1017/s004857729997155x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  17 in total

1.  Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Anja Hahne; Douglas Saddy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-01

2.  Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: an ERP study.

Authors:  Edith Kaan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-03

3.  An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences.

Authors:  Yoshiko Yamada; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies.

Authors:  Tali Ditman; Phillip J Holcomb; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  The effects of attention and task-relevance on the processing of syntactic violations during listening to two concurrent speech streams.

Authors:  Orsolya Szalárdy; Brigitta Tóth; Dávid Farkas; Annamária Kovács; Gábor Urbán; Gábor Orosz; Beáta Tünde Szabó; László Hunyadi; Botond Hajdu; István Winkler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Electrophysiological responses to argument structure violations in healthy adults and individuals with agrammatic aphasia.

Authors:  Aneta Kielar; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Reduced resource optimization in male alcoholics: N400 in a lexical decision paradigm.

Authors:  Bangalore N Roopesh; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Chella Kamarajan; David B Chorlian; Ashwini K Pandey; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Dispreferred adjective orders elicit brain responses associated with lexico-semantic rather than syntactic processing.

Authors:  Hsu-Wen Huang; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Priming deficiency in male subjects at risk for alcoholism: the N4 during a lexical decision task.

Authors:  Bangalore N Roopesh; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Chella Kamarajan; David B Chorlian; Arthur Stimus; Lance O Bauer; John Rohrbaugh; Sean J O'Connor; Samuel Kuperman; Marc Schuckit; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing.

Authors:  Laura Batterink; Helen Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.