Literature DB >> 30802979

The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.

Michelle Leckey1, Kara D Federmeier1,2,3.   

Abstract

Since its discovery in the 1960s, the P300 has been contributing both directly and indirectly to language research. Perhaps most notably, it has been suggested that the P600, an ERP component that was first characterized in the context of syntactic processing, could be a variant of the P3b subcomponent of the P300. Here, we review studies on both sides of the debate. We also review the "semantic P600," a positivity with a similar time course and distribution to the P600 seen for syntactic manipulations but that is obtained in response to some types of semantic anomalies. Because most current theories of the P600 try to account for both the syntactic and the semantic variant, linking the syntactic P600 to the P3b might also imply a similar link for the semantic P600. However, we describe emerging research in our lab that casts doubt on the idea that the syntactic P600 and the semantic P600 are the same effect. We argue that grouping ERP responses primarily by domain (language vs. nonlanguage) is likely to be misleading and suggest alternative ways of determining whether ERP effects reflect similar or different processing mechanisms.
© 2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; P3b; P600; language/speech

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30802979      PMCID: PMC7934419          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  83 in total

1.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  P Hagoort; C M Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Anja Hahne; Douglas Saddy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-01

3.  Syntactic processing with aging: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Laura Kemmer; Seana Coulson; Esmeralda De Ochoa; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Chia-Lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-23       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  P300 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm.

Authors:  M Fabiani; D Karis; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time.

Authors:  G McCarthy; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  It's All in the Family: Brain Asymmetry and Syntactic Processing of Word Class.

Authors:  Chia-lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05-11

9.  A taurine and caffeine-containing drink stimulates cognitive performance and well-being.

Authors:  R Seidl; A Peyrl; R Nicham; E Hauser
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 10.  Neural origins of the P300.

Authors:  M Soltani; R T Knight
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2000
View more
  16 in total

1.  Cerebellar Theta and Beta Noninvasive Stimulation Rhythms Differentially Influence Episodic Memory versus Semantic Prediction.

Authors:  Shruti Dave; Stephen VanHaerents; Joel L Voss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The interplay between respectfulness and lexical-semantic in reading Chinese: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Liyan Ji; Lin Cai
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Comprehending surprising sentences: sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.842

4.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Jeremy Donai; Alexandra S Kadner; Molly L Layne; Andrew Forino; Sijin Wen; Si Gao; Margeaux M Gray; Alexandria J Ashraf; Gabriela N Valencia; Brandon D Smith; Stephanie K Khoo; Stephen J Gray; Norman Lass; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Susannah Engdahl; David Graham; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  A starring role for inference in the neurocognition of visual narratives.

Authors:  Neil Cohn
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-02-15

7.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Surprisal in Language Comprehension: A Neurocomputational Model.

Authors:  Harm Brouwer; Francesca Delogu; Noortje J Venhuizen; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-11

8.  Investigating Heritage Language Processing: Meaning Composition in Chinese Classifier-Noun Phrasal Contexts.

Authors:  Fei Li; Xiangfei Hong; Zhaoying He; Sixuan Wu; Chenyi Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-17

9.  Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Brain and Behavior: Testing the Independence of P300 and N400 Related Processes in Behavioral Responses to Sentence Categorization.

Authors:  Phillip M Alday; Franziska Kretzschmar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Catecholaminergic Modulation of Semantic Processing in Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Yingying Tan; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.