Literature DB >> 16901469

Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing.

Kara D Federmeier1, Edward W Wlotko, Esmeralda De Ochoa-Dewald, Marta Kutas.   

Abstract

Behavioral and electrophysiological studies have uncovered different patterns of constraint effects on the processing of words in sentences. Whereas response time measures have indicated a reduced scope of facilitation from strongly constraining contexts, event-related brain potential (ERP) measures have instead revealed enhanced facilitation for semantically related endings in such sentences. Given this disparity, and the concomitant possibility of functionally separable stages of context effects, the current study jointly examined expectancy (cloze probability) and constraint effects on the ERP response to words. Expected and unexpected (but plausible) words completed strongly and weakly constraining sentences; unexpected items were matched for contextual fit across the two levels of constraint and were semantically unrelated to the most expected endings. N400 amplitudes were graded by expectancy but unaffected by constraint and seemed to index the benefit of contextual information. However, a later effect, in the form of increased frontal positivity from 500 to 900 ms post-stimulus-onset, indicated a possible cost associated with the processing of unexpected words in strongly constraining contexts.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16901469      PMCID: PMC2704150          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  20 in total

1.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  A D Friederici; A Mecklinger; K M Spencer; K Steinhauer; E Donchin
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-04

2.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  P Hagoort; C M Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing.

Authors:  K D Federmeier; M Kutas
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

4.  Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: an ERP study.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Devon B McLennan; Esmeralda De Ochoa; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Seana Coulson; Ying Choon Wu
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

8.  On priming by a sentence context.

Authors:  K E Stanovich; R F West
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-03

9.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Effects of stimulus and contextual information on the lexical decision process.

Authors:  R E Schuberth; K T Spoehr; D M Lane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-01
View more
  106 in total

1.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; David M Groppe; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas; Rina Schul
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

4.  Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  The Neural Computation of Scalar Implicature.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne; Jesse Snedeker; Stephanie Yen-Mun Liem Azar; Albert E Kim
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Elin Runnqvist; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Authors:  Megan Zirnstein; Janet G van Hell; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20

10.  Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Ming Xiang; Gina Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.