Literature DB >> 10972759

Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature.

K Ritland1.   

Abstract

This paper presents a perspective of how inferred relatedness, based on genetic marker data such as microsatellites or amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), can be used to demonstrate quantitative genetic variation in natural populations. Variation at two levels is considered: among pairs of individuals within populations, and among pairs of subpopulations within a population. In the former, inferred pairwise relatedness, combined with trait measures, allow estimates of heritability 'in the wild'. In the latter, estimates of QST are obtained, in the absence of known heritabilities, via estimates of pairwise FST. Estimators of relatedness based on the 'Kronecker operator' are given. Both methods require actual variation of relationship, a rarely studied aspect of population structure, and not necessarily present. Some conditions for appropriate population structures in the wild are identified, in part through a review of recent studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10972759     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00971.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  37 in total

1.  Selective recovery of founder genetic diversity in aquacultural broodstocks and captive, endangered fish populations.

Authors:  R W Doyle; R Perez-Enriquez; M Takagi; N Taniguchi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.

Authors:  Brook G Milligan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Contrasting patterns of morphological and physiological differentiation across insular environments: phenotypic variation and heritability of light-related traits in Olea europaea.

Authors:  C García-Verdugo; M Méndez; N Velázquez-Rosas; L Balaguer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Common garden experiments in the genomic era: new perspectives and opportunities.

Authors:  P de Villemereuil; O E Gaggiotti; M Mouterde; I Till-Bottraud
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Implications of using genomic prediction within a high-density SNP dataset to predict DUS traits in barley.

Authors:  Huw Jones; Ian Mackay
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Toby Johnson; Dario Beraldi; Tim Clutton-Brock; Dave Coltman; Bengt Hansson; Goran Spong; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Spectrum of genetic diversity and networks of clonal organisms.

Authors:  Alejandro F Rozenfeld; Sophie Arnaud-Haond; Emilio Hernández-García; Víctor M Eguíluz; Manuel A Matías; Ester Serrão; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars.

Authors:  Flavio Breseghello; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.