Literature DB >> 17339212

A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations.

Amy D Anderson1, Bruce S Weir.   

Abstract

A maximum-likelihood estimator for pairwise relatedness is presented for the situation in which the individuals under consideration come from a large outbred subpopulation of the population for which allele frequencies are known. We demonstrate via simulations that a variety of commonly used estimators that do not take this kind of misspecification of allele frequencies into account will systematically overestimate the degree of relatedness between two individuals from a subpopulation. A maximum-likelihood estimator that includes F(ST) as a parameter is introduced with the goal of producing the relatedness estimates that would have been obtained if the subpopulation allele frequencies had been known. This estimator is shown to work quite well, even when the value of F(ST) is misspecified. Bootstrap confidence intervals are also examined and shown to exhibit close to nominal coverage when F(ST) is correctly specified.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17339212      PMCID: PMC1893072          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.063149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  Long homozygous chromosomal segments in reference families from the centre d'Etude du polymorphisme humain.

Authors:  K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.

Authors:  M Lynch; K Ritland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The genetical structure of populations.

Authors:  S WRIGHT
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1951-03

4.  A haplotype map of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Measures of human population structure show heterogeneity among genomic regions.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir; Lon R Cardon; Amy D Anderson; Dahlia M Nielsen; William G Hill
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations.

Authors:  David A Hinds; Laura L Stuve; Geoffrey B Nilsen; Eran Halperin; Eleazar Eskin; Dennis G Ballinger; Kelly A Frazer; David R Cox
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Significant genetic correlations among Caucasians at forensic DNA loci.

Authors:  D J Balding; R A Nichols
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands.

Authors:  D J Balding; R A Nichols
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Greater differences in forensic DNA profile frequencies estimated from racial groups than from ethnic subgroups.

Authors:  B Budowle; K L Monson
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 10.  Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir; Amy D Anderson; Amanda B Hepler
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  31 in total

1.  Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating Relatedness in the Presence of Null Alleles.

Authors:  Kang Huang; Kermit Ritland; Derek W Dunn; Xiaoguang Qi; Songtao Guo; Baoguo Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  PBAP: a pipeline for file processing and quality control of pedigree data with dense genetic markers.

Authors:  Alejandro Q Nato; Nicola H Chapman; Harkirat K Sohi; Hiep D Nguyen; Zoran Brkanac; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Consanguinity in Centre d'Étude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) pedigrees.

Authors:  Eric L Stevens; Greg Heckenberg; Joseph D Baugher; Elisha D O Roberson; Thomas J Downey; Jonathan Pevsner
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Characterizing allelic association in the genome era.

Authors:  B S Weir; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  The IBD process along four chromosomes.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes.

Authors:  S Maenhout; B De Baets; G Haesaert
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 8.  Identity by descent: variation in meiosis, across genomes, and in populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population.

Authors:  Marco C A M Bink; Amy D Anderson; W Eric van de Weg; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  REFINING GENETICALLY INFERRED RELATIONSHIPS USING TREELET COVARIANCE SMOOTHING.

Authors:  Andrew Crossett; Ann B Lee; Lambertus Klei; Bernie Devlin; Kathryn Roeder
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.