Literature DB >> 10430599

Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.

M Lynch1, K Ritland.   

Abstract

Applications of quantitative genetics and conservation genetics often require measures of pairwise relationships between individuals, which, in the absence of known pedigree structure, can be estimated only by use of molecular markers. Here we introduce methods for the joint estimation of the two-gene and four-gene coefficients of relationship from data on codominant molecular markers in randomly mating populations. In a comparison with other published estimators of pairwise relatedness, we find these new "regression" estimators to be computationally simpler and to yield similar or lower sampling variances, particularly when many loci are used or when loci are hypervariable. Two examples are given in which the new estimators are applied to natural populations, one that reveals isolation-by-distance in an annual plant and the other that suggests a genetic basis for a coat color polymorphism in bears.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10430599      PMCID: PMC1460714     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  The correlation between relatives in a random mating population.

Authors:  O KEMPTHORNE
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1954-12-15

2.  Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient.

Authors:  C C LI; D G HORVITZ
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1953-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A restriction on the space of genetic relationships.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  The estimation of pairwise relationships.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Higher order probability functions of identity of allelles by descent.

Authors:  C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness.

Authors:  C C Li; D E Weeks; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers.

Authors:  M Lynch; B G Milligan
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears.

Authors:  D Paetkau; W Calvert; I Stirling; C Strobeck
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.185

  9 in total
  235 in total

1.  Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data.

Authors:  S C Thomas; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating the time to the most recent common ancestor for the Y chromosome or mitochondrial DNA for a pair of individuals.

Authors:  B Walsh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.

Authors:  Brook G Milligan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Ani Manichaikul; Josyf C Mychaleckyj; Stephen S Rich; Kathy Daly; Michèle Sale; Wei-Min Chen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  MHC-mediated spatial distribution in brown trout (Salmo trutta) fry.

Authors:  B O'Farrell; J A H Benzie; P McGinnity; J Carlsson; E de Eyto; E Dillane; C Graham; J Coughlan; T Cross
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Contrasting relatedness patterns in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) with different alliance strategies.

Authors:  Michael Krützen; William B Sherwin; Richard C Connor; Lynne M Barré; Tom Van de Casteele; Janet Mann; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Overview of techniques to account for confounding due to population stratification and cryptic relatedness in genomic data association analyses.

Authors:  M J Sillanpää
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  REFINING GENETICALLY INFERRED RELATIONSHIPS USING TREELET COVARIANCE SMOOTHING.

Authors:  Andrew Crossett; Ann B Lee; Lambertus Klei; Bernie Devlin; Kathryn Roeder
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.