Literature DB >> 11891342

How many named species are valid?

John Alroy1.   

Abstract

Estimates of biodiversity in both living and fossil groups depend on raw counts of currently recognized named species, but many of these names eventually will prove to be synonyms or otherwise invalid. This difficult bias can be resolved with a simple "flux ratio" equation that compares historical rates of invalidation and revalidation. Flux ratio analysis of a taxonomic data set of unrivalled completeness for 4,861 North American fossil mammal species shows that 24-31% of currently accepted names eventually will prove invalid, so diversity estimates are inflated by 32-44%. The estimate is conservative compared with one obtained by using an older, more basic method. Although the degree of inflation varies through both historical and evolutionary time, it has a minor impact on previously published background origination and extinction rates. Several lines of evidence suggest that the same bias probably affects more poorly studied, hyperdiverse living groups such as fungi and insects. If so, then current estimates of total global diversity could be revised downwards to as low as 3.5-10.5 million species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11891342      PMCID: PMC122588          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.062691099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  An empirical assessment of taxic paleobiology.

Authors:  J M Adrain; S R Westrop
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns.

Authors:  J J Sepkoski
Journal:  Paleobiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Biodiversity: past, present, and future.

Authors:  J J Sepkoski
Journal:  J Paleontol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.471

4.  The currency and tempo of extinction.

Authors:  H M Regan; R Lupia; A N Drinnan; M A Burgman
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  How many species are there on Earth?

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The future of biodiversity.

Authors:  S L Pimm; G J Russell; J L Gittleman; T M Brooks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation.

Authors:  R K Colwell; J A Coddington
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Conceptual aspects of the quantification of the extent of biological diversity.

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa.

Authors:  M Foote; D M Raup
Journal:  Paleobiology       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Declines of biomes and biotas and the future of evolution.

Authors:  D S Woodruff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  23 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data.

Authors:  Jorge Soberón; A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Tropical forests and the changing earth system.

Authors:  Simon L Lewis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Is Rapoport's rule a recent phenomenon? A deep time perspective on potential causal mechanisms.

Authors:  Nikolai M Veter; Larisa R G DeSantis; Lindsey T Yann; Shelly L Donohue; Ryan J Haupt; Sarah E Corapi; Siobhan L Fathel; Emily K Gootee; Lucas F Loffredo; Jennifer L Romer; Stoycho M Velkovsky
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Probabilistic models of species discovery and biodiversity comparisons.

Authors:  Stewart M Edie; Peter D Smits; David Jablonski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estimating the diversity of dinosaurs.

Authors:  Steve C Wang; Peter Dodson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fossil quality and naming dinosaurs.

Authors:  Michael J Benton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The taxonomic significance of species that have only been observed once: the genus Gymnodinium (Dinoflagellata) as an example.

Authors:  Anne E Thessen; David J Patterson; Shauna A Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  iCODEHOP: a new interactive program for designing COnsensus-DEgenerate Hybrid Oligonucleotide Primers from multiply aligned protein sequences.

Authors:  Richard Boyce; Parmit Chilana; Timothy M Rose
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Global coordination and standardisation in marine biodiversity through the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and related databases.

Authors:  Mark J Costello; Philippe Bouchet; Geoff Boxshall; Kristian Fauchald; Dennis Gordon; Bert W Hoeksema; Gary C B Poore; Rob W M van Soest; Sabine Stöhr; T Chad Walter; Bart Vanhoorne; Wim Decock; Ward Appeltans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evolutionary history of lagomorphs in response to global environmental change.

Authors:  Deyan Ge; Zhixin Wen; Lin Xia; Zhaoqun Zhang; Margarita Erbajeva; Chengming Huang; Qisen Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.