Literature DB >> 22952856

The taxonomic significance of species that have only been observed once: the genus Gymnodinium (Dinoflagellata) as an example.

Anne E Thessen1, David J Patterson, Shauna A Murray.   

Abstract

Taxonomists have been tasked with cataloguing and quantifying the Earth's biodiversity. Their progress is measured in code-compliant species descriptions that include text, images, type material and molecular sequences. It is from this material that other researchers are to identify individuals of the same species in future observations. It has been estimated that 13% to 22% (depending on taxonomic group) of described species have only ever been observed once. Species that have only been observed at the time and place of their original description are referred to as oncers. Oncers are important to our current understanding of biodiversity. They may be validly described species that are members of a rare biosphere, or they may indicate endemism, or that these species are limited to very constrained niches. Alternatively, they may reflect that taxonomic practices are too poor to allow the organism to be re-identified or that the descriptions are unknown to other researchers. If the latter are true, our current tally of species will not be an accurate indication of what we know. In order to investigate this phenomenon and its potential causes, we examined the microbial eukaryote genus Gymnodinium. This genus contains 268 extant species, 103 (38%) of which have not been observed since their original description. We report traits of the original descriptions and interpret them in respect to the status of the species. We conclude that the majority of oncers were poorly described and their identity is ambiguous. As a result, we argue that the genus Gymnodinium contains only 234 identifiable species. Species that have been observed multiple times tend to have longer descriptions, written in English. The styles of individual authors have a major effect, with a few authors describing a disproportionate number of oncers. The information about the taxonomy of Gymnodinium that is available via the internet is incomplete, and reliance on it will not give access to all necessary knowledge. Six new names are presented - Gymnodinium campbelli for the homonymous name Gymnodinium translucens Campbell 1973, Gymnodinium antarcticum for the homonymous name Gymnodinium frigidum Balech 1965, Gymnodinium manchuriensis for the homonymous name Gymnodinium autumnale Skvortzov 1968, Gymnodinium christenum for the homonymous name Gymnodinium irregulare Christen 1959, Gymnodinium conkufferi for the homonymous name Gymnodinium irregulare Conrad & Kufferath 1954 and Gymnodinium chinensis for the homonymous name Gymnodinium frigidum Skvortzov 1968.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22952856      PMCID: PMC3431360          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  27 in total

1.  Extinction: bad genes or bad luck?

Authors:  D Raup
Journal:  New Sci       Date:  1991-09-14       Impact factor: 0.319

2.  Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions.

Authors:  Anne E Magurran; Peter A Henderson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Protist diversity is different?

Authors:  Bland J Finlay; Genoveva F Esteban; Tom Fenchel
Journal:  Protist       Date:  2004-03

4.  A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gotelli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Taxonomy and phylogeny of a new kleptoplastidal dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium myriopyrenoides sp. nov. (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae), and its cryptophyte symbiont.

Authors:  Haruyo Yamaguchi; Takeshi Nakayama; Atsushi Kai; Isao Inouye
Journal:  Protist       Date:  2011-04-14

6.  An outlook on the fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences in GenBank and the introduction of a web-based tool for the exploration of fungal diversity.

Authors:  Martin Ryberg; Erik Kristiansson; Elisabet Sjökvist; R Henrik Nilsson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Determining species boundaries in a world full of rarity: singletons, species delimitation methods.

Authors:  Gwynne S Lim; Michael Balke; Rudolf Meier
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Defining DNA-based operational taxonomic units for microbial-eukaryote ecology.

Authors:  David A Caron; Peter D Countway; Pratik Savai; Rebecca J Gast; Astrid Schnetzer; Stefanie D Moorthi; Mark R Dennett; Dawn M Moran; Adriane C Jones
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  GYMNODINIUM COROLLARIUM SP. NOV. (DINOPHYCEAE)-A NEW COLD-WATER DINOFLAGELLATE RESPONSIBLE FOR CYST SEDIMENTATION EVENTS IN THE BALTIC SEA(1).

Authors:  Annica M Sundström; Anke Kremp; Niels Daugbjerg; Øjvind Moestrup; Marianne Ellegaard; Regina Hansen; Susanna Hajdu
Journal:  J Phycol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.923

10.  Morphological variation and phylogenetic analysis of the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium aureolum from a tributary of Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Ying Zhong Tang; Todd A Egerton; Lesheng Kong; Harold G Marshall
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.346

View more
  3 in total

1.  From Parasitized to Healthy-Looking Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Morphological Reconstruction Using Algorithmic Processing.

Authors:  Sándor Csősz; Ferenc Báthori; Mathieu Molet; Gábor Majoros; Zoltán Rádai
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  The LifeWatch approach to the exploration of distributed species information.

Authors:  Daniel Fuentes; Nicola Fiore
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  The use and limits of scientific names in biological informatics.

Authors:  David Remsen
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.