Literature DB >> 18796391

Fossil quality and naming dinosaurs.

Michael J Benton1.   

Abstract

The intense interest in dinosaurs through the past 30 years might have led to an increase in poor practice in naming new species. A review of the data shows that the reverse is the case. For 130 years, from the 1820s to the 1950s, most new species of dinosaurs were based on scrappy and incomplete material. After 1960, the majority of new species have been based on complete skulls or skeletons, and sometimes on materials from several individuals. This switch in the quality of type specimens corresponds to the recent explosive renaissance of interest in dinosaurs, during which the number of new species named per year has risen, from three or four in the 1950s, to thirty or more today. The pattern of specimen quality varies by continent, with the highest proportion of new species based on good material in North America, then Asia, then South America, then Africa and finally Europe. This ranking reflects a complex pattern of perhaps overstudy in Europe, immensely rich reserves of new dinosaur materials in North America and Asia, and a relative paucity in South America and Africa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18796391      PMCID: PMC2614166          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  4 in total

Review 1.  Getting the measure of biodiversity.

Authors:  A Purvis; A Hector
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  How many named species are valid?

Authors:  John Alroy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Counting dinosaurs: how many kinds were there?

Authors:  P Dodson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Estimating the diversity of dinosaurs.

Authors:  Steve C Wang; Peter Dodson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.

Authors:  Yimeng Li; Marcello Ruta; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Torosaurus is not Triceratops: ontogeny in chasmosaurine ceratopsids as a case study in dinosaur taxonomy.

Authors:  Nicholas R Longrich; Daniel J Field
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How has our knowledge of dinosaur diversity through geologic time changed through research history?

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza; Matthew Baron
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.